Pregled po CROSBI profilu: Svjetlana Došenović (CROSBI Profil: 38871, MBZ: 389361)
Pronađeno 40 radova
-
1.Health-Related Quality of Life of COVID-19 Survivors Treated in Intensive Care Unit— Prospective Observational Study // Journal of intensive care medicine (2023) doi:10.1177/08850666231158547 (međunarodna recenzija, online first)
-
2.Characteristics, completion and publication of PROSPERO records in regional anesthesia for acute perioperative pain // Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 1 (2023), 1-10 doi:10.2217/cer-2022-0129 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
3.Effects of Different Inhalation Therapy on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial // Microorganisms, 10 (2022), 6; 1-14 doi:10.3390/microorganisms10061118 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
4.Long lasting airway maintenance by help of the surgical tape // Anesthesia and Analgesia
Prag, Češka Republika, 2021. str. 395-396 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, stručni) -
5.Assessing the risk of performance and detection bias in Cochrane reviews as a joint domain is less accurate compared to two separate domains // Bmc medical research methodology, 21 (2021), 1; 1-11 doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01339-1 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
6.Pain assessment in clinical trials: a narrative review // Annals of Translational Medicine, 9 (2021), 2; 188-188 doi:10.21037/atm-20-3451 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
7.Reasons and factors associated with inconclusiveness of systematic reviews about interventions for neuropathic pain // Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 10 (2021), 1; 67-75 doi:10.2217/cer-2020-0165 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
8.Uloga Parklandske formule u liječenju opsežne duboke opekline – prikaz bolesnika // Liječnički vjesnik : glasilo Hrvatskoga liječničkog zbora, 142 (2020), 1-2; 24-28 doi:10.26800/LV-142-1-2-7 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
9.Risk-of-bias judgments for blinding of outcome assessors in Cochrane Reviews were often inadequate // Advances in Evidence Synthesis: special issue. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020 ; (9 Suppl 1). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD202001
Toronto, Kanada: John Wiley & Sons, 2020. str. 350-350 doi:10.1002/14651858.cd202001 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, prošireni sažetak, stručni) -
10.'Risk of bias' assessments for random sequence generation and blinding of participants and personnel in Cochrane Systematic Reviews were frequently inadequate // Abstracts accepted for the 26th Cochrane Colloquium
Santiago, Čile: John Wiley & Sons, 2020. str. 94-95 doi:http://10.1002/14651858.cd201901 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, prošireni sažetak, stručni) -
11.Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study // Bmc medical research methodology, 20 (2020), 1; 240, 11 doi:10.1186/s12874-020-01123-7 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
12.Assessing risk of bias judgments for blinding of outcome assessors in Cochrane reviews // Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 9 (2020), 8; 585-593 doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0181 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
13.Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency as a Method of Dorsal Root Ganglia Stimulation in Patients with Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review // Pain Medicine, pnaa141 (2020), pnaa141, 10 doi:10.1093/pm/pnaa141 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
14.Biomedical conferences’ author instructions rarely mention guidelines for reporting abstracts of trials and systematic reviews // Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 9 (2020), 2; 83-91 doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0158 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
15.Efficacy and safety of pulsed radiofrequency as a method of dorsal root ganglia stimulation for treatment of non-neuropathic pain: a systematic review // BMC Anesthesiology, 20 (2020), 1; 105, 21 doi:10.1186/s12871-020-01023-9 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
16.Conference abstracts describing systematic reviews on pain were selectively published, not reliable, and poorly reported // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 117 (2020), 1-8 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.011 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
17.Perioperacijski postupci kod bolesnika na antitrombocitnoj i antikoagulantnoj terapiji // Acta medica Croatica, 73 (2019), 1; 37-41 (međunarodna recenzija, pregledni rad, znanstveni)
-
18.Outcome domains and pain outcome measures in randomized controlled trials of interventions for postoperative pain in children and adolescents // European Journal of Pain, 23 (2019), 2; 389-396 doi:10.1002/ejp.1313 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
19.Outcome Domains, Outcome Measures, and Characteristics of Randomized Controlled Trials Testing Nonsurgical Interventions for Osteoarthritis // The Journal of Rheumatology, 47 (2019), 1; 126-131 doi:10.3899/jrheum.180985 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
20.Neuromodulation with electrical field stimulation of dorsal root ganglion in various pain syndromes: a systematic review with focus on participant selection // Journal of pain research, 2019 (2019), 12; 803-830 doi:10.2147/JPR.S168814 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
21.Efficacy and safety of modified-release paracetamol for acute and chronic pain: a systematic review protocol // BMJ Open, 9 (2019), e029728-e029728 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029728 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
22.Awareness and acceptability of Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials core outcome set for chronic pain among surveyed neuropathic pain authors // Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 8 (2019), 9; 671-683 doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0123 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
23.Risk of bias assessments for blinding of participants and personnel in Cochrane reviews were frequently inadequate // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 113 (2019), 104-113 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.012 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
24.Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook // Bmc medical research methodology, 19 (2019), 1; 170-170 doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0804-y (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
25.Selective reporting bias due to discrepancies between registered and published outcomes in osteoarthritis trials // Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 8 (2019), 15; 1265-1273 doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0068 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
