Pregled po CROSBI profilu: Ivan Buljan (CROSBI Profil: 36199, MBZ: 391484, ORCID: 0000-0002-8719-7277)
Pronađeno 65 radova
-
1.Linguistic analysis of plain language summaries and corresponding scientific summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews about oncology interventions // Cancer Medicine, 12 (2023), 9; 10950-10960 doi:10.1002/cam4.5825 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
2.Introducing the Library of Guidance for Health Scientists (LIGHTS) // JAMA Network Open, 6 (2023), 2; e2253198, 12 doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53198 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, ostalo)
-
3.Perception of organizational climate by university staff and students in medicine and humanities: A qualitative study // Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance, NA (2023), 1-27 doi:10.1080/08989621.2023.2173586 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
4.Researchers on research integrity: a survey of European and American researchers // F1000Research, 12 (2023), 1-19 doi:10.12688/f1000research.128733.1 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
5.Stakeholders' Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities: A Qualitative Study in Three European Countries // Science and engineering ethics, 28 (2022), 5; 43, 23 doi:10.1007/s11948-022-00390-5 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
6.Knowledge and Practice of Pediatricians Regarding Hypovitaminosis D—A Survey across 33 European Countries // Children (Basel), 9 (2022), 12; 1831, 12 doi:10.3390/children9121831 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
7.Effectiveness of letters to patients with or without Cochrane blogshots on 10-year cardiovascular risk change among women in menopausal transition: 6-month three-arm randomized controlled trial // BMC MEDICINE, 20 (2022), 1; 381, 10 doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02555-2 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
8.Validation of a new instrument for assessing attitudes on psychedelics in the general population // SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 12 (2022), 1; 18225, 10 doi:10.1038/s41598-022-23056-5 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
9.Creating an online educational intervention to improve knowledge about systematic reviews among healthcare workers: mixed-methods pilot study // BMC Medical Education, 22 (2022), 1; 1, 10 doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03763-3 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
10.Factors Associated with the Quality and Transparency of National Guidelines: A Mixed-Methods Study // International journal of environmental research and public health, 19 (2022), 15; 9515, 22 doi:10.3390/ijerph19159515 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
11.Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: a scoping review // Accountability in Research (2022) doi:10.1080/08989621.2022.2073819 (međunarodna recenzija, online first)
-
12.Academic and non-academic predictors of academic performance in medical school: an exploratory cohort study // BMC Medical Education, 22 (2022), 1; 366, 9 doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03436-1 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
13.Predictors of academic progression and desire to continue education for undergraduate and graduate nursing students: Cross-sectional study and a nested follow-up study // Nurse Education Today, 111 (2022), 105274, 15 doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105274 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
14.Neurophysiological impairment in multiple sclerosis patient confirmed by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the central nervous system but not with electrical stimulation of peripheral nervous system. // Abstracts from the IFESS 2021 conferences. Artificial Organs 46 (3).
Rovinj, Hrvatska, 2022. str. E182-E186 doi:10.1111/aor.14132 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni) -
15.Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study // Science and Public Policy, 49 (2021), 2; 246-266 doi:10.1093/scipol/scab077 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
16.Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts // Accountability in Research, (2021), 1989676; 1-38 doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1989676 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
17.Responsible research and innovation training programs: implementation and evaluation of the HEIRRI project // Forensic Sciences Research, 6 (2021), 4; 320-330 doi:10.1080/20961790.2021.1970319 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
18.Cognitive levels in testing knowledge in evidence- based medicine: a cross sectional study // BMC Medical Education, 21 (2021), 1; 25, 12 doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02449-y (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
19.Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review // Science and Engineering Ethics, 27 (2021), 1; 4, 20 doi:10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
20.Perspectives of key stakeholders on essential virtues for good scientific practice in research areas // Accountability in Research, 1 (2021), 1-32 doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1900739 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
21.Interventions for Organizational Climate and Culture in Academia: A Scoping Review // Science and Engineering Ethics, 27 (2021), 2; 24, 21 doi:10.1007/s11948-021-00298-6 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
22.Enhanced access to recommendations from the Cochrane Handbook for improving authors' judgments about risk of bias: A randomized controlled trial // Research Synthesis Methods, 12 (2021), 5; 618-629 doi:10.1002/jrsm.1499 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
23.Impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on study satisfaction and burnout in medical students in Split, Croatia: a cross-sectional presurvey and postsurvey // BMJ Open, 11 (2021), 6; e049590, 11 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049590 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
24.Ethics issues identified by applicants and ethics experts in Horizon 2020 grant proposals // F1000Research, 10 (2021), NA; NA-NA doi:10.12688/f1000research.52965.2 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
25.A retrospective analysis of the peer review of more than 75,000 Marie Curie proposals between 2007 and 2018 // eLife, 10 (2021) doi:10.7554/elife.59338 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
