Pregled po CROSBI profilu: Livia Puljak (CROSBI Profil: 23423, MBZ: 287953, ORCID: 0000-0002-8467-6061)
Pronađeno 386 radova
-
126.Methodological studies evaluating evidence are not systematic reviews // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 110 (2019), 98-99 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.002 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
127.Reproducibility of search strategies of non- Cochrane systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals is suboptimal: primary methodological study // British Journal of Anaesthesia, 122 (2019), 6; e79-e81 doi:10.1016/j.bja.2019.02.014 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
128.Capacity building for knowledge translation: A survey about the characteristics and motivation of volunteer translators of Cochrane plain language summaries // Journal of evidence-based medicine, 12 (2019), 2; 147-154 doi:10.1111/jebm.12345 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
129.Revisiting established medicines: An overview of systematic reviews about ibuprofen and paracetamol for treating pain in children // European Journal of Pain, 23 (2019), 6; 1071-1082 doi:10.1002/ejp.1380 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
130.Following Cochrane review protocols to completion 10 years later: a retrospective cohort study and author survey // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 111 (2019), 41-48 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.006 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
131.Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments // Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 3 (2019), 3; 1-61 doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009562.pub2 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
132.Overactive bladder symptoms in patients undergoing rigid and flexible cystoscopy // World Journal of Urology, Online ahead of print (2019), 10.1007/s00345-019-02993-3, 10 doi:10.1007/s00345-019-02993-3 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
133.Neuromodulation with electrical field stimulation of dorsal root ganglion in various pain syndromes: a systematic review with focus on participant selection // Journal of pain research, 2019 (2019), 12; 803-830 doi:10.2147/JPR.S168814 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
134.Efficacy and safety of modified-release paracetamol for acute and chronic pain: a systematic review protocol // BMJ Open, 9 (2019), e029728-e029728 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029728 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
135.The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey // Bmc medical research methodology, 19 (2019), 1; 77-77 doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0718-8 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
136.Awareness and acceptability of Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials core outcome set for chronic pain among surveyed neuropathic pain authors // Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 8 (2019), 9; 671-683 doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0123 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
137.Reporting checklist for methodological, that is, research on research studies is urgently needed // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 112 (2019), 93-93 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.016 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
138.Risk of bias assessments for selective reporting were inadequate in the majority of Cochrane reviews // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 112 (2019), 53-58 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.007 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
139.Research-on-research studies or methodological studies are primary research // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 112 (2019), 95-95 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.013 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
140.Risk of bias assessments for blinding of participants and personnel in Cochrane reviews were frequently inadequate // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 113 (2019), 104-113 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.012 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
141.Registration of methodological studies, that is, “research-on-research” studies—should it be mandatory? // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 115 (2019), 35-36 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.017 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
142.Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook // Bmc medical research methodology, 19 (2019), 1; 170-170 doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0804-y (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
143.Comparison of information sources used in Cochrane and non‐Cochrane systematic reviews: A case study in the field of anesthesiology and pain // Research Synthesis Methods, 10 (2019), 4; 597-605 doi:10.1002/jrsm.1375 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
144.Methodological research: open questions, the need for 'research on research' and its implications for evidence-based health care and reducing research waste // International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 17 (2019), 3; 145-146 doi:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000201 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
145.Half of systematic reviews about pain registered in PROSPERO were not published and the majority had inaccurate status // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 116 (2019), 114-121 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.08.010 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
146.Selective reporting bias due to discrepancies between registered and published outcomes in osteoarthritis trials // Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 8 (2019), 15; 1265-1273 doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0068 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
147.Reporting and analyses of sex/gender and race/ethnicity in randomized controlled trials of interventions published in the highest- ranking anesthesiology journals // Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 8 (2019), 16; 1417-1423 doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0071 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
148.Reporting checklists are used as measurement tools for assessing quality, even though they have not been validated for such use // Trials, 20 (2019), 1; 676-676 doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3858-6 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
149.Assessment of reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analysis using PRISMA-A and discordance in assessments between raters without prior experience // Bmc medical research methodology, 19 (2019), 1; 1-7 doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0675-2 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
-
150.Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study // BMJ Open, 9 (2019), 8; e029704-e029704 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029704 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
