Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 997382
Follicular phase sampling for Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measurements – a real necessity?
Follicular phase sampling for Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measurements – a real necessity? // 5th EFLM Conference on Preanalytical Phase, Preanalytical challenges – time for solutions / Plebani, Mario (ur.).
Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2019. str. eA25-eA25 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 997382 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Follicular phase sampling for Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measurements – a real necessity?
Autori
Dojder, Ana ; Tomas, Matea ; Radišić Biljak, Vanja ; Šimundić, Ana-Maria
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
5th EFLM Conference on Preanalytical Phase, Preanalytical challenges – time for solutions
/ Plebani, Mario - Berlin : Walter de Gruyter, 2019, EA25-eA25
Skup
5th EFLM Conference on Preanalytical Phase
Mjesto i datum
Zagreb, Hrvatska, 22.03.2019. - 23.03.2019
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
preanalytical phase, anti- Müllerian hormone (AMH), menstrual phases
Sažetak
BACKGROUND-AIM: According to the manufacturer (Beckman Coulter, USA), blood sampling for AMH measurement should be performed between the 2nd and the 4th day of the menstrual cycle. The aim of this study was to assess the possible differences in AMH concentration, relative to the phase of menstrual cycle. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 12 healthy volunteers at three phases of regular menstrual cycle (i.e. 3 samples per each subject): 1) between the 2nd and 4th day (follicular phase), 2) on 14th (ovulation) and 3) on 21st day (luteal phase) of menstrual cycle. The samples were analyzed by chemiluminescent method on DXI 600 (Beckman Coulter, USA) analyzer. The concentrations of AMH were compared by non-parametric Friedman test using MedCalc Statistical Software version 16.2.0 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium), wherein P-value <0.05 was considered as significant. Method CV(%) was assessed in accordance to CLSI EP15-A3 guideline. Mean bias of all subjects for luteal phase and ovulation compared with follicular phase were calculated. According to Bungum et al. (Front Endocrinol, 2018) bias was considered acceptable if <3.9 pmol/L. RESULTS: The observed precision was below 5%. Median age of the participants was 37 years (24–45). Median values (in pmol/L) across menstrual phases were as follows: 16.4 (8.9–28.55) for follicular phase, 20.35 (11.75–28.55) and 18.55 (8.9–26.4) for ovulatory and luteal phase, respectively. Friedman test revealed no statistically significant difference between the median AMH values across the different stages of the menstrual cycle (P=0.058). Mean biases for ovulation (-1.7, 95% Cl: -3.1 - -0.4) and luteal phase (0.2, 95% Cl: -3.5 – 3.9) were within acceptance criteria. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results showed no significant difference of AMH concentration analyzed during different phases of menstrual cycle. Further investigations with higher number of samples should be done to confirm our findings.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE