Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 992913
Comparison of clinical assessment and multifrequency bioimpedance analysis as methods of estimating volume status in peritoneal dialysis patients - A single-center experience
Comparison of clinical assessment and multifrequency bioimpedance analysis as methods of estimating volume status in peritoneal dialysis patients - A single-center experience // Clinical nephrology, 91 (2019), 334-343 doi:10.5414/CN109158 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 992913 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparison of clinical assessment and multifrequency bioimpedance analysis as methods of estimating volume status in peritoneal dialysis patients - A single-center experience
Autori
Vujičić, Božidar ; Dorčić, Gordan ; Babić, Vesna ; Rundić, Anamarija ; Devčić, Bosiljka ; Šimac, Davor Viktor ; Zaputović, Luka ; Rački, Sanjin
Izvornik
Clinical nephrology (0301-0430) 91
(2019);
334-343
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis ; volume status ; assessment ; hypervolemia ; peritoneal dialysis
Sažetak
INTRODUCTION. Clinical assessment (CA) is frequently used for the evaluation of volume status in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients despite its subjectivity. Multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MF-BIA) is objective, accurate, and quick, proving to be a promising technique for measuring volume status. The aim of this study was to assess volume status in PD patients using CA and MF- BIA and to compare results. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Incident PD patients were prospectively analyzed between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2016, at the Clinical Hospital Center of -Rijeka, Croatia. Volume status measurements were performed once a month for 6 consecutive months. The presence of symptoms and signs associated with hyper- or hypovolemia were detected by CA. Euvolemia was defined as a symptom-free state or up to 2 symptoms maximum. Patients lacking up to 1.2 L of volume or with up to 1.2 L in excess were considered euvolemic, as measured by MF-BIA. RESULTS. A total of 45 PD patients were analyzed ; 51% were men, 27% were diabetic, the mean age was 52±26 years, and PD duration was 11.5±6.5 months. In comparison to MF-BIA, CA showed a significant difference in detected hypervolemia between baseline and follow-up (p=0.708 vs. p=0.01, respectively) and among all measurements (p<0.01). Contrary to CA, volume status measured by MF-BIA correlated significantly with systolic and diastolic blood pressure (R=0.29 ; p≤0.01 and R=0.26 ; p≤0.01, respectively). CA showed low sensitivity (0.24) and high specificity (0.92) in detecting hypervolemia. CONCLUSION. MF-BIA is an effective, objective, and safe method for assessing volume status in PD patients. Longitudinal monitoring of body composition changes - including hydration state - leading to adequate therapeutic intervention is a promising and potential application of MF- BIA along with CA.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka,
Klinički bolnički centar Rijeka
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE