Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 990042
Examining reading comprehension of expository texts in L2: Graphic organizers vs. multiple- choice questions
Examining reading comprehension of expository texts in L2: Graphic organizers vs. multiple- choice questions // Applied Linguistic Research and Methodology. Proceedings from the CALS Conference 2015. / Cergol Kovačević, Kristina ; Udier, Sanda Lucija (ur.).
Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2017. str. 103-120 doi:10.3726/b10830 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), ostalo)
CROSBI ID: 990042 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Examining reading comprehension of expository texts in L2: Graphic organizers vs. multiple- choice questions
Autori
Sladoljev-Agejev, Tamara ; Kabalin Borenić, Višnja
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), ostalo
Izvornik
Applied Linguistic Research and Methodology. Proceedings from the CALS Conference 2015.
/ Cergol Kovačević, Kristina ; Udier, Sanda Lucija - Frankfurt : Peter Lang, 2017, 103-120
ISBN
978-3-631-71748-6
Skup
The 29th CALS international conference “Applied Linguistic Research and Methodology
Mjesto i datum
Zagreb, Hrvatska, 24.04.2015. - 26.04.2015
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
reading comprehension, expository text, L2, graphic organizers, multiple-choice questions
Sažetak
Reading is a complex skill which depends on a number of factors including general language proficiency, background knowledge or reading tasks. Comprehension occurs at different levels (e.g. word, sentence, discourse, relation to prior knowledge), so it is measured using a variety of tasks whose content and form may affect readers’ performance. In our research we compared performance in the comprehension of college-level expository texts in English (L2) tested with two different question formats: multiple-choice questions (MC), a standard tool in reading comprehension research methodology, and graphic organizer completion tasks (GO) as a less common method of comprehension assessment. Significantly better performance was observed in GO compared to MC. The GO performance less strongly correlated with both L2 competence measures (L2 proficiency, text-specific vocabulary) than the performance in MC. The results are discussed within the framework of cognitive models of text comprehension and the interaction of bottom-up/top-down processes. It is suggested that the explicit text structure provided by GO may have triggered top-down cognitive processes which facilitate comprehension.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Filologija, Kognitivna znanost (prirodne, tehničke, biomedicina i zdravstvo, društvene i humanističke znanosti)
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Ekonomski fakultet, Zagreb