Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 989578
Retention of title in the European Union: Is there possibility for harmonization
Retention of title in the European Union: Is there possibility for harmonization // Leadership and Management: Integrated Politics of Research and Innovations Conference Proceedings / Bevanda, Vuk (ur.).
Beograd: All in One Print Center, Beograd, 2018. str. 24-34 doi:10.31410/limen.2018.24 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 989578 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Retention of title in the European Union: Is there possibility for harmonization
Autori
Medić, Ines ; Grgić, Mia
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Leadership and Management: Integrated Politics of Research and Innovations Conference Proceedings
/ Bevanda, Vuk - Beograd : All in One Print Center, Beograd, 2018, 24-34
ISBN
978-86-80194-15-8
Skup
4th International Scientific-Business Conference LIMEN 2018
Mjesto i datum
Beograd, Srbija, 13.12.2018
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
Retention of title, European Union, harmonization, property law
Sažetak
Although there are 28 national jurisdictions in the European Union, due to the extensive process of harmonization their national public rules have much in common. Private law area, on the other hand, remains mainly unconcerned/untouched by this process, especially in the area of property law. Retention of title clause is one of the most important tools for the protection of the seller's rights under the sales contract, but it arises from the nucleus of property law. It means, among other thins, that it remains heavily influenced by local legal tradition. As such it can be one of the obstacles for the free movement of goods and services. Having this in mind it is of no surprise that for the last three decades the EU has been trying to come up with the European notion of the retention of title clause. Different advantages as well as disadvantages of the cross-border relations in the area of contract law with the implications on the property law would best be met by the autonomous notion of this clasuse. Despite the obvious willingnes of the EU in regulating the subject matter, question remains whether the EU competences include this area. What about article 295 of the EC Treaty which seems to prevent the EU from legislative actions in the area of property law? What about numerus clausus? Also, it may be argued that this issue has already been dealt with on the level of UNIDROIT as well as UNCITRAL and with not much success. The intention of the authors is to show and to explain how common European retention of title clause could lead to more secure and certain transactionos within the internal market.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
- Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Sciences & Humanities (CPCI-SSH)
- Scopus