Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 988270
Manual Intracardiac Electrogram Method Is Accurate Alternative to Echocardiography for Atrioventricular and Interventricular Optimization in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Manual Intracardiac Electrogram Method Is Accurate Alternative to Echocardiography for Atrioventricular and Interventricular Optimization in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy // Acta clinica Croatica, 56 (2017), 4; 618-624 doi:10.20471/acc.2017.56.04.06 (recenziran, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 988270 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Manual Intracardiac Electrogram Method Is Accurate
Alternative to Echocardiography for
Atrioventricular and Interventricular Optimization
in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Autori
Pezo Nikolić, Borka ; Lovrić, Daniel ; Ljubas Maček, Jana ; Rešković Lukšić, Vlatka ; Matasić, Richard ; Šeparović Hanževački, Jadranka
Izvornik
Acta clinica Croatica (0353-9466) 56
(2017), 4;
618-624
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Intracardiac electrogram ; Optimization ; Cardiac resynchronization therapy ; Atrioventricular delay ; Interventricular VV delay
Sažetak
Some manufacturers do not provide automated intracardiac electrogram method (IEGM) systems for atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delay optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of manual IEGM method in 48 patients previously implanted with Medtronic Syncra CRT. All patients underwent standard device interrogation followed by CRT optimization by IEGM method and by echocardiography one month after implantation. The patient mean age was 60.7±11.8 years and there were 33 (68.8%) males. After CRT implantation, the left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 28.0±7.9% to 39.1±11.0% (p<0.001). Optimal aortic flow Velocity Time Integral (aVTI) was obtained when VV was set to 20-50 ms left ventricular pre- activation. There was a strong correlation between VV values determined by echocardiography and IEGM (R=0.823, p<0.001). We found no significant difference in AV, VV and aVTI values between echocardiography and IEGM method. However, IEGM was significantly less time-consuming than echocardiography [20 (10-28) vs. 40 (35-60) minutes, p<0.001]. Manual IEGM method may be good alternative to echocardiography and automated IEGM method. It also emphasizes the need for implementation of automated IEGM systems in as many CRT devices as possible.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Zagreb
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE