Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 985556
Periphyton on different substrates in tufa depositing system
Periphyton on different substrates in tufa depositing system // Book of Abstracts, 3rd Symposium of Freshwater Biology / Ivković, Marija ; Stanković, Igor ; Matoničkin Kepčija, Renata ; Gračan, Romana (ur.).
Zagreb: Hrvatsko udruženje slatkovodnih ekologa, 2019. str. 28-28 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 985556 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Periphyton on different substrates in tufa depositing system
Autori
Radočaj, Tena ; Matoničkin Kepčija, Renata ; Gulin, Vesna ; Sertić Perić, Mirela ; Goreta, Gordana ; Kepec, Mirjana
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
Book of Abstracts, 3rd Symposium of Freshwater Biology
/ Ivković, Marija ; Stanković, Igor ; Matoničkin Kepčija, Renata ; Gračan, Romana - Zagreb : Hrvatsko udruženje slatkovodnih ekologa, 2019, 28-28
Skup
3. simpozij o biologiji slatkih voda (SOBS2019)
Mjesto i datum
Zagreb, Hrvatska, 15.02.2019
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
Krka National Park, leaf litter, tufa, artificial substrate, protozoa
Sažetak
Tufa barriers have a variety of substrata, thus creating heterogeneous habitats for periphyton. We investigated the effect of three substrate types on periphyton diversity at Skradinski buk tufa barrier (Krka National Park). Samples of periphyton were taken from tufa substrate and leaf litter within experimental reach of the barrier experiencing modifications in hydrology due to the invasive species (Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swinge) removal. The dominant leaf litter species belonged to hornbeam (Ostrya carpinifolia). Periphyton was also sampled using artificial substrate (i.e., glass slides), placed on the same barrier, but within reach having permanent flow. Highest quantities of calcium carbonate precipitates were found on tufa substrates, while the calcite content on leaf litter and artificial substrates was lower. At tufa and leaf litter substrates periphyton sub- sampling was done by resuspension, while artificial substrate allowed direct examination. Determinations were done on live material, and showed ciliate dominance. The periphyton on the leaf litter comprised 49 taxa, while tufa substrate supported 22 taxa. Artificial substrate sustained different and the most diverse community, containing 64 taxa. Cluster analysis showed a clear separation of communities between the three substrates. Vagile periphytic taxa dominated on tufa substrate and leaf litter, while sessile taxa of suctorians and peritrichs had highest share in artificial substrate periphyton. Sampling technique can partly explain this difference, as artificial substrate analysis is the least destructive. Obtained results show high heterogeneity of periphyton within the same tufa barrier. Further research should address the periphyton diversity on artificial substrate within experimental reach.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Biologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet, Zagreb
Profili:
Gordana Goreta
(autor)
Mirela Sertić Perić
(autor)
Renata Matoničkin Kepčija
(autor)
Tena Radočaj
(autor)
Vesna Gulin Beljak
(autor)