Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 977706

Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author’s Perspective


Drvenica, Ivana; Bravo, Giangiacomo; Vejmelka, Lucija; Dekanski, Aleksandar; Nedić, Olgica
Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author’s Perspective // Publications / MDPI, 7 (2018), 1; 1, 10 doi:10.3390/publications7010001 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 977706 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author’s Perspective

Autori
Drvenica, Ivana ; Bravo, Giangiacomo ; Vejmelka, Lucija ; Dekanski, Aleksandar ; Nedić, Olgica

Izvornik
Publications / MDPI (2304-6775) 7 (2018), 1; 1, 10

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
reviewers’ reports ; authors’ opinion ; on-line survey ; mixed-effect model ; content analysis

Sažetak
The aim of this study was to investigate the opinion of authors on the overall quality and effectiveness of reviewers’ contributions to reviewed papers. We employed an on-line survey of thirteen journals which publish articles in the field of life, social or technological sciences. Responses received from 193 authors were analysed using a mixed-effects model in order to determine factors deemed the most important in the authors’ evaluation of the reviewers. Qualitative content analysis of the responses to open questions was performed as well. The mixed-effects model revealed that the authors’ assessment of the competence of referees strongly depended on the final editorial decision and that the speed of the review process was influential as well. In Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) analysis on seven questions detailing authors’ opinions, perception of review speed remained a significant predictor of the assessment. In addition, both the perceived competence and helpfulness of the reviewers significantly and positively affected the authors’ evaluation. New models were used to re-check the value of these two factors and it was confirmed that the assessment of the competence of reviewers strongly depended on the final editorial decision.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Interdisciplinarne društvene znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Lucija Vejmelka (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

Pristup cjelovitom tekstu rada doi www.mdpi.com

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Drvenica, Ivana; Bravo, Giangiacomo; Vejmelka, Lucija; Dekanski, Aleksandar; Nedić, Olgica
Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author’s Perspective // Publications / MDPI, 7 (2018), 1; 1, 10 doi:10.3390/publications7010001 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Drvenica, I., Bravo, G., Vejmelka, L., Dekanski, A. & Nedić, O. (2018) Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author’s Perspective. Publications / MDPI, 7 (1), 1, 10 doi:10.3390/publications7010001.
@article{article, author = {Drvenica, Ivana and Bravo, Giangiacomo and Vejmelka, Lucija and Dekanski, Aleksandar and Nedi\'{c}, Olgica}, year = {2018}, pages = {10}, DOI = {10.3390/publications7010001}, chapter = {1}, keywords = {reviewers’ reports, authors’ opinion, on-line survey, mixed-effect model, content analysis}, journal = {Publications / MDPI}, doi = {10.3390/publications7010001}, volume = {7}, number = {1}, issn = {2304-6775}, title = {Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author’s Perspective}, keyword = {reviewers’ reports, authors’ opinion, on-line survey, mixed-effect model, content analysis}, chapternumber = {1} }
@article{article, author = {Drvenica, Ivana and Bravo, Giangiacomo and Vejmelka, Lucija and Dekanski, Aleksandar and Nedi\'{c}, Olgica}, year = {2018}, pages = {10}, DOI = {10.3390/publications7010001}, chapter = {1}, keywords = {reviewers’ reports, authors’ opinion, on-line survey, mixed-effect model, content analysis}, journal = {Publications / MDPI}, doi = {10.3390/publications7010001}, volume = {7}, number = {1}, issn = {2304-6775}, title = {Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author’s Perspective}, keyword = {reviewers’ reports, authors’ opinion, on-line survey, mixed-effect model, content analysis}, chapternumber = {1} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
  • Scopus


Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka::


  • dblp Computer Science Bibliography
  • DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
  • EconPapers (RePEc)
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • IDEAS (RePEc)
  • Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals Series and Publishers (NSD)
  • RePEcexternal


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font