Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 968534
Diocletian’s palace in the post-war architectural discourse of the team 10
Diocletian’s palace in the post-war architectural discourse of the team 10 // Liminal spaces of art between Europe and the Middle East / Prijatelj Pavičić, Ivana ; Vicelja Matijašić, Marina ; Germ, Martin ; Cerkovnik, Gašper ; Meke, Katra ; Babnik, Ines ; Díaz Fernández, Nina (ur.).
Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2018. str. 12-27
CROSBI ID: 968534 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Diocletian’s palace in the post-war architectural discourse of the team 10
Autori
Bojić, Nikola
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Poglavlja u knjigama, znanstveni
Knjiga
Liminal spaces of art between Europe and the Middle East
Urednik/ci
Prijatelj Pavičić, Ivana ; Vicelja Matijašić, Marina ; Germ, Martin ; Cerkovnik, Gašper ; Meke, Katra ; Babnik, Ines ; Díaz Fernández, Nina
Izdavač
Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Grad
Newcastle upon Tyne
Godina
2018
Raspon stranica
12-27
ISBN
1-5275-0878-1
Ključne riječi
Dioklecijanova palača, Jacob Bakema, Team 10, Le Corbusier, strukturalizam
(Diocletian's Palace, Jacob Bakema, Team 10, Le Corbusier, structuralism)
Sažetak
The goal of this research was to determine the position of Diocletian’s palace in Split within the post-war architectural discourse, primarily by examining the work of Dutch architect Jacob Bakema, a member of the international architectural group Team 10. Four decades after Le Corbusier’s visionary project “Contemporary City for Three Million Inhabitants”(1922), Jacob Bakema published the study “An Emperor’s House in Split Became a Town for Three Thousand People”(1962) in the Dutch architectural journal Forum. Bakema’s article shed light on two principles important for spatial organization of the Palace: structure (roman layer) which is observed as a fixed framework for numerous architectural infills (all other historical layers) rendered throughout the long history of urban life at the site. According to Bakema, the principles of structure and infill were crucial for the architectural theory and practice in the post-war period of the 20th century. The Palace was important, but it was not the only model for post-war architectural structures. Aside from the Palace, other Team 10 members referred to kasbah, a traditional Islamic urban typology in countries on the southern Mediterranean coast, such as Morocco or Algeria. Diocletian’s palace and the architecture of kasbah are both characterized by flexibility, growth and movement, which are the three main architectural characteristics that played a role in the design of the two influential post-war projects: Free University in Berlin (Candilis, Josic, Woods ; built, 1963) and Venice hospital (Le Corbusier ; unbuilt, 1964).
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Arhitektura i urbanizam, Povijest umjetnosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
HRZZ-IP-2013-11-6270 - Moderne i suvremene umjetničke mreže, umjetničke grupe i udruženja: Organizacijski i komunikacijski modeli suradničkih umjetničkih praksi 20. i 21. stoljeća (ARTNET) (Kolešnik, Ljiljana, HRZZ - 2013-11) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Institut za povijest umjetnosti, Zagreb
Profili:
Nikola Bojić
(autor)