Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 964471
A person, a dog, and a vase: The effect of avatar type in a perspective-taking task
A person, a dog, and a vase: The effect of avatar type in a perspective-taking task // Proceedings of the 24th Scientific Conference Empirical Studies In Psychology / Damnjanović, Kaja ; Stepanović Ilić, Ivana ; Marković, Slobodan (ur.).
Beograd: Institute of Psychology ; Laboratory for Experimental Psychology (LEP), 2018. str. 89-91 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 964471 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
A person, a dog, and a vase: The effect of avatar type in a perspective-taking task
Autori
Dujmović, Marin ; Valerjev, Pavle
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Proceedings of the 24th Scientific Conference Empirical Studies In Psychology
/ Damnjanović, Kaja ; Stepanović Ilić, Ivana ; Marković, Slobodan - Beograd : Institute of Psychology ; Laboratory for Experimental Psychology (LEP), 2018, 89-91
ISBN
978-86-6427-090-8
Skup
24. naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji = 24th Empirical Studies in Psychology Conference
Mjesto i datum
Beograd, Srbija, 24.03.2018. - 26.03.2018
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
mentalizing ; perspective taking ; dot perspective task ; visual attention
Sažetak
Recent research has shown people process what another person sees even when not explicitly taking the other person perspective. Results show people are slower in their responses when a different number of stimuli can be seen from one's own and the avatar’s (other) perspective. In these incongruent trials, the avatar's perspective interferes with the response about one’s own perspective and vice versa. However, a question remains whether this is purely a consequence of perceptual cueing or if social information contributes to the effect. The goal of our study was to investigate differences in automatic processing depending on avatar type. The experiment was a 2 (perspective) × 2 (congruence) × 2 (avatar type) repeated measures design. Participants were significantly slower for incongruent trials and from the other's perspective. Additionally, perspective by avatar type interaction was significant. Participants were slower from the other's perspective only for human avatars, but not when the avatar was a dog. These results may imply additional time is required to take the perspective of a human being while the perspective of a dog represents a perceptive cue rather than requiring that additional step. We may conclude both perceptual and social information may contribute to perspective taking.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Psihologija
