Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 958187
Roots of the Resistance to the Change in the Supreme Court`s Role
Roots of the Resistance to the Change in the Supreme Court`s Role // Transformation of Civil Justice: Unity and Diversity. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 70. / Uzelac, Alan ; van Rhee, Cornelis Hendrik (Remco) (ur.).
Cham: Springer, 2018. str. 333-348 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97358-6_18 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 958187 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Roots of the Resistance to the Change in the
Supreme Court`s Role
Autori
Bratković, Marko
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Transformation of Civil Justice: Unity and Diversity. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 70.
/ Uzelac, Alan ; van Rhee, Cornelis Hendrik (Remco) - Cham : Springer, 2018, 333-348
ISBN
978-3-319-97357-9
Skup
Conference on Transformation of Civil Justice: Unity and Diversity
Mjesto i datum
Dubrovnik, Hrvatska, 28.05.2017. - 02.06.2017
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
Supreme Court, public role, Croatia
Sažetak
In recent years, a paradigm shift in the supreme court’s role from a private to a public purpose has been recognised in many jurisdictions. Due to growing backlogs at supreme courts in many countries, the private purpose of the just and correct resolution of every individual case has given place to a public purpose consisting in safeguarding and promoting the public interest of ensuring uniformity of case law, the development of the law, and offering guidance to lower courts. However, this paradigm shift has met with considerable criticism from a large part of the legal community. It has been argued that litigants will become exposed to judicial arbitrariness and that more restrictive access to the supreme court means less protection of equality before the law. In order to explore the possible roots of the resistance to the change in the supreme court’s role, Faulkner’s polyperspective technique of narration used in the novel The Sound and the Fury might be of some help. The retelling of more or less the same story from the perspective of the individual party, the attorney-at-law, the supreme court and the constitutional court reveals that in favouring the public interest of uniform application of the law some particular interests of all involved have to be suppressed, and the broader picture taken into account.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
HRZZ-IP-2013-11-6988 - Preobrazba građanskog pravosuđa pod utjecajem globalnih i regionalnih integracijskih procesa. Jedinstvo i različitost (TCJust-UD) (Uzelac, Alan, HRZZ - 2013-11) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Zagreb
Profili:
Marko Bratković
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Sciences & Humanities (CPCI-SSH)