Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 954464

Does the New Always Prevail? Parallel Modes of Procedure in the History of Procedural Transformations


Held, Henrik-Riko
Does the New Always Prevail? Parallel Modes of Procedure in the History of Procedural Transformations // Transformation of civil Justice : unity and diversity / Uzelac, Alan ; van Rhee, Cornelis Hendrik (Remco) (ur.).
Cham: Springer, 2018. str. 381-400 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97358-6_20


CROSBI ID: 954464 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Does the New Always Prevail? Parallel Modes of Procedure in the History of Procedural Transformations

Autori
Held, Henrik-Riko

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Poglavlja u knjigama, znanstveni

Knjiga
Transformation of civil Justice : unity and diversity

Urednik/ci
Uzelac, Alan ; van Rhee, Cornelis Hendrik (Remco)

Izdavač
Springer

Grad
Cham

Godina
2018

Raspon stranica
381-400

ISBN
978-3-319-97357-9

ISSN
1534-6781

Ključne riječi
legis actiones ; formulary procedure ; lex Aebutia ; assumpsit, trial by jury ; romano-canonical procedure ; Bagatellverfahren ; Summarverfahren ; civil procedural reforms ; Roman law

Sažetak
This paper provides a historical-comparative analysis of the phases of certain relevant civil procedural reforms in which for a certain period of time the old and the new mode of procedure existed in parallel, with the possibility of the parties’ choice between the two. In the analysis, a threefold perspective is assumed, and the problem is approached from the perspective of Roman law, historical English common law and procedural law reforms in lands of the Habsburg Monarchy in the 19th century. In the analysed periods, contrary to expectations, the parties disregarded the general evaluation of a new procedure’s efficiency. Instead, they were prone to prefer the procedure that suited their immediate interests the best, even if it was generally considered to be outdated. Presence of this phenomenon throughout millennia and in disparate jurisdictions indicates the necessity to calculate its effects into scholarly and practical assessments of any given procedural reform.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Pravo

Napomena
Knjiga je dio serije knjiga Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
HRZZ-IP-2013-11-6988 - Preobrazba građanskog pravosuđa pod utjecajem globalnih i regionalnih integracijskih procesa. Jedinstvo i različitost (TCJust-UD) (Uzelac, Alan, HRZZ - 2013-11) ( CroRIS)

Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Henrik-Riko Held (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi link.springer.com

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Held, Henrik-Riko
Does the New Always Prevail? Parallel Modes of Procedure in the History of Procedural Transformations // Transformation of civil Justice : unity and diversity / Uzelac, Alan ; van Rhee, Cornelis Hendrik (Remco) (ur.).
Cham: Springer, 2018. str. 381-400 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97358-6_20
Held, H. (2018) Does the New Always Prevail? Parallel Modes of Procedure in the History of Procedural Transformations. U: Uzelac, A. & van Rhee, C. (ur.) Transformation of civil Justice : unity and diversity. Cham, Springer, str. 381-400 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97358-6_20.
@inbook{inbook, author = {Held, Henrik-Riko}, year = {2018}, pages = {381-400}, DOI = {10.1007/978-3-319-97358-6\_20}, keywords = {legis actiones, formulary procedure, lex Aebutia, assumpsit, trial by jury, romano-canonical procedure, Bagatellverfahren, Summarverfahren, civil procedural reforms, Roman law}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-97358-6\_20}, isbn = {978-3-319-97357-9}, issn = {1534-6781}, title = {Does the New Always Prevail? Parallel Modes of Procedure in the History of Procedural Transformations}, keyword = {legis actiones, formulary procedure, lex Aebutia, assumpsit, trial by jury, romano-canonical procedure, Bagatellverfahren, Summarverfahren, civil procedural reforms, Roman law}, publisher = {Springer}, publisherplace = {Cham} }
@inbook{inbook, author = {Held, Henrik-Riko}, year = {2018}, pages = {381-400}, DOI = {10.1007/978-3-319-97358-6\_20}, keywords = {legis actiones, formulary procedure, lex Aebutia, assumpsit, trial by jury, romano-canonical procedure, Bagatellverfahren, Summarverfahren, civil procedural reforms, Roman law}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-97358-6\_20}, isbn = {978-3-319-97357-9}, issn = {1534-6781}, title = {Does the New Always Prevail? Parallel Modes of Procedure in the History of Procedural Transformations}, keyword = {legis actiones, formulary procedure, lex Aebutia, assumpsit, trial by jury, romano-canonical procedure, Bagatellverfahren, Summarverfahren, civil procedural reforms, Roman law}, publisher = {Springer}, publisherplace = {Cham} }

Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font