Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 953105
On Leisure in the Grasshopper- Aristotle, J. Pieper, and B. Suits
On Leisure in the Grasshopper- Aristotle, J. Pieper, and B. Suits // Book of Abstracts 46th Annual Meeting IAPS International Association for the Philosophy of Sport
Oslo: Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway, 2018. str. 76-76 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 953105 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
On Leisure in the Grasshopper- Aristotle, J. Pieper, and B. Suits
Autori
Škerbić, Matija Mato
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
Book of Abstracts 46th Annual Meeting IAPS International Association for the Philosophy of Sport
/ - Oslo : Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway, 2018, 76-76
Skup
46th Annual Meeting International Association for the Philosophy of Sport (IAPS 2018)
Mjesto i datum
Oslo, Norveška, 04.09.2018. - 09.09.2018
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
leisure, utopia, Aristotle, J. Pieper, B. Suits
Sažetak
In this paper, I am focusing on the notion of scholé or leisure in the Bernard H. Suits masterpiece The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia. My intention is threefold. First, I intend to show where and how Suits is using the term. Leisure was mentioned 7 times in the book in three different meanings: firstly as something “good” contrary to “survival” (Suits, 1978, pp.8) ; secondly as notion “leisure activities” equivalent to “play” (ibid., pp.15, 16), to life of Grasshopper (ibid., pp.16), and to “playing a game” (ibid., pp. 15, 16) ; and thirdly in the formulation “the metaphysics of leisure time” (ibid., pp.176). My second aim, however, is to put more light on the meaning and the usage of the term per se and related to The Grasshopper. In that regard, I will use Aristotle's understandings of leisure presented in the Nicomachean Ethics and Politics, and Josef Pieper in the Leisure. The Basis of Culture. Thus, leisure is something opposite to human labor as an existential provider of the necessary. In that sense, Aristotle claim that “happiness seems to be present in leisure, for we engage in unleisured pursuits in order that we may be at leisure” (Aristotle, 2002, pp.217) is more than significant. On the other hand, leisure is “of all things principal” (Aristotle, 2009, 1337b): free time for self-realization, creativity, science, contemplation, “a space of freedom, of true learning, of attunement to the world-as-a- whole” (Pieper, 1998, pp.57), and - play(ing games). My final aim is to show that Suits is impoverishing the content of the “metaphysics of leisure time” by focusing (only) on just one meaning – playing games. Furthermore, how come that in Suits “intelligible” Utopia (Suits, 1978, pp.171), not like in the other philosophically developed Utopias (T. More, T. Campanella, F. Petrić, F. Bacon), only the game-playing is seen as an “ideal of existence” (ibid., pp.166)?
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Filozofija