Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 939201

Empirical Comparison of three Methods for Approximating DEX Utility Functions


Mihelčić, Matej; Bohanec, Marko
Empirical Comparison of three Methods for Approximating DEX Utility Functions // Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Operational Research SOR15 / Stirn, L. Zadnik ; Žerovnik J. ; Borštnar Kljajić M ; Drobne S. (ur.).
Ljubljana: Slovensko društvo Informatika. Sekcija za operacijske raziskave, 2015. str. 29-34 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 939201 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Empirical Comparison of three Methods for Approximating DEX Utility Functions

Autori
Mihelčić, Matej ; Bohanec, Marko

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni

Izvornik
Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Operational Research SOR15 / Stirn, L. Zadnik ; Žerovnik J. ; Borštnar Kljajić M ; Drobne S. - Ljubljana : Slovensko društvo Informatika. Sekcija za operacijske raziskave, 2015, 29-34

ISBN
978-961-6165-45-7

Skup
International Symposium on Operations Research

Mjesto i datum
Bled, Slovenija, 23.09.2015. - 25.09.2015

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
decision support ; multi-criteria decision making ; utility function ; DEX ; UTADIS ; conjoint analysis ; direct marginals method

Sažetak
DEX is a qualitative multi-criteria decision analysis method. It provides support to decision makers in evaluating and choosing decision alternatives, using discrete attributes and rule- based utility functions. This work builds upon our previous attempt of approximating DEX utility functions with methods UTA and ACUTA, aimed at improving the sensitivity of qualitative models and providing an interpretation of DEX utility functions. In this work we empirically compare three methods for approximating qualitative DEX utility functions with piecewise-linear marginal utility functions: Direct marginals, UTADIS and Conjoint analysis. The results show that these methods can accurately approximate complete, monotone DEX utility functions.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Računarstvo



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Institut "Ruđer Bošković", Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Matej Mihelčić (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

www.researchgate.net www.researchgate.net

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Mihelčić, Matej; Bohanec, Marko
Empirical Comparison of three Methods for Approximating DEX Utility Functions // Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Operational Research SOR15 / Stirn, L. Zadnik ; Žerovnik J. ; Borštnar Kljajić M ; Drobne S. (ur.).
Ljubljana: Slovensko društvo Informatika. Sekcija za operacijske raziskave, 2015. str. 29-34 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
Mihelčić, M. & Bohanec, M. (2015) Empirical Comparison of three Methods for Approximating DEX Utility Functions. U: Stirn, L., Žerovnik J., Borštnar Kljajić M & Drobne S. (ur.)Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Operational Research SOR15.
@article{article, author = {Mihel\v{c}i\'{c}, Matej and Bohanec, Marko}, year = {2015}, pages = {29-34}, keywords = {decision support, multi-criteria decision making, utility function, DEX, UTADIS, conjoint analysis, direct marginals method}, isbn = {978-961-6165-45-7}, title = {Empirical Comparison of three Methods for Approximating DEX Utility Functions}, keyword = {decision support, multi-criteria decision making, utility function, DEX, UTADIS, conjoint analysis, direct marginals method}, publisher = {Slovensko dru\v{s}tvo Informatika. Sekcija za operacijske raziskave}, publisherplace = {Bled, Slovenija} }
@article{article, author = {Mihel\v{c}i\'{c}, Matej and Bohanec, Marko}, year = {2015}, pages = {29-34}, keywords = {decision support, multi-criteria decision making, utility function, DEX, UTADIS, conjoint analysis, direct marginals method}, isbn = {978-961-6165-45-7}, title = {Empirical Comparison of three Methods for Approximating DEX Utility Functions}, keyword = {decision support, multi-criteria decision making, utility function, DEX, UTADIS, conjoint analysis, direct marginals method}, publisher = {Slovensko dru\v{s}tvo Informatika. Sekcija za operacijske raziskave}, publisherplace = {Bled, Slovenija} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font