Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 934899
Kinematical differences of handstand technique
Kinematical differences of handstand technique // 15th International Scientific Conference on Transformation Process in Sport "Sport Performance": Book of Abstracts / Bjelica, Duško ; Popović, Stevo ; Akpinar, Selçuk (ur.).
Nikšić: Montenegrin Sports Academy, 2018. str. 16-17 (predavanje, recenziran, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 934899 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Kinematical differences of handstand technique
Autori
Živčić Marković, Kamenka ; Milčić, Lucija ; Krističević, Tomislav ; Aleksić-Veljković, Aleksandra ; Lagančić, Tea
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
15th International Scientific Conference on Transformation Process in Sport "Sport Performance": Book of Abstracts
/ Bjelica, Duško ; Popović, Stevo ; Akpinar, Selçuk - Nikšić : Montenegrin Sports Academy, 2018, 16-17
ISBN
978-9940-569-21-1
Skup
15th International Scientific Conference on Transformation Process in Sport: Sport Performance
Mjesto i datum
Budva, Crna Gora, 12.04.2018. - 15.04.2018
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Recenziran
Ključne riječi
kinematic parameters ; handstand technique ; gymnasts
Sažetak
Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the kinematic parameters which define the handstand technique by the certain phases of its execution between different levels of quality in relation to a handstand model of an elite gymnast. Methods: The participants were five second-year students of the Faculty of Kinesiology and have already completed the Artistic Gymnastics 1. The participants were selected by choice, after being evaluated from 1 to 5 grades by three gymnastics experts. Different handstand techniques were compared with a model of handstand which was performed by an elite gymnast. The sample of variables consisted of kinematic parameters that were extracted from the key positions of certain handstand phases. Kinematic parameters were extracted with the program package MVN Studio BIOMECH Software (Xsens North America Inc.), and their processing was done by the ANOVA analysis. Results: The results show that there was no statistically significant distinction between the kinematic variables of the participants and the model of the gymnast, but differences were visible in the descriptive parameters. Also, they were different on a scale of 1 to 5 grades, as estimated by the gymnastics experts. Discussion: A handstand is considered as a basic acrobatic element which is an essential part of a large number of complex elements on gymnastics apparatus. It is of importance to mention that methodical and didactical principles need to be followed during learning and mastering of the technique (Uzunov, 2008 ; Živčić Marković & Krističević, 2016). Although acquired data indicates that there is no statistically significant distinction between the execution of participants and the model of handstand technique, while descriptive results display large differences in quality of the technique. Other investigations show that the most difference was in the time needed for execution and angles in shoulder joints during all phases of handstand execution (Kerwin & Trewartha 2001 ; Kochanowicz et al. 2015).
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kineziologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Kineziološki fakultet, Zagreb