Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 920676
Croatian-Hungarian Compromise between cooperation and conflict
Croatian-Hungarian Compromise between cooperation and conflict // Conflict and Cooperation. 150 years of the Austro- Hungarian Settlement
Budimpešta, Mađarska, 2017. str. x-x (predavanje, podatak o recenziji nije dostupan, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 920676 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Croatian-Hungarian Compromise between cooperation and conflict
Autori
Čepulo, Dalibor
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Skup
Conflict and Cooperation. 150 years of the Austro- Hungarian Settlement
Mjesto i datum
Budimpešta, Mađarska, 30.11.2017. - 01.12.2017
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Podatak o recenziji nije dostupan
Ključne riječi
Croatian-Hungarian Compromise
Sažetak
In 1867 the Croatian-Slavonian Diet refused to accept that the status of Croatia and Slavonia in Hungary, silently implied in the Austro- Hungarian Compromise, could have been decided without its prior consent, which made the King to dissolute it. The new Diet elected on compromitted elections soon accepted the Croatian-Hungarian Compromise (1868) after negotiations on an equal basis with Hungarian Diet. The Compromise granted Croatia autonomy but it also introduced a number of control instruments operated by the government in Budapest. The document was neither fully consistent nor completed which made its execution in practice highly dependent upon actual political interests. In that way, the Croatian-Hungarian Compromise provided a framework for intensive modernization during the administration of Ban Ivan Mažuranić (1873– 1880) as well as for its obstruction during the rule of Ban Károly Khuen- Héderváry (1883–1903). Pragmatic and incomplete character (“neither-nor”) made the Croatian- Hungarian Compromise acceptable but an unstable provisional compromise that only partly neutralized the tensions appearing in practice. The inconsistency of the Compromise provoked systematic tensions preventing a clear form of regulation (“either-or”). The inconsistent character of the Compromise also opened possibilities for various theoretical interpretations of Croatian autonomy ranging from autonomous province to statehood.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo, Povijest