Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 919465

Some (critical) remarks on Priest’s dialetheist reading of Nagarjuna


Kardaš, Goran
Some (critical) remarks on Priest’s dialetheist reading of Nagarjuna // European journal of analytic philosophy, 11 (2015), 2; 35-49 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 919465 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Some (critical) remarks on Priest’s dialetheist reading of Nagarjuna

Autori
Kardaš, Goran

Izvornik
European journal of analytic philosophy (1845-8475) 11 (2015), 2; 35-49

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Nagarjuna ; Candrakirti ; emptiness ; semantics ; contradiction ; paradox

Sažetak
Graham Priest in collaboration with J. Garfield and Y. Deguchi (henceforth: DGP) wrote several articles and responses arguing that the Buddhist philosopher N ̄ag ̄arjuna was a dialetheist thinker, i.e. that he not just identified and exposed certain contradictions but that he embraced it. These contradictions, according to DGP, always occur “at the limits of thought” i.e. when a certain view at the same time transcends the limit (“transcendence”) and is within that limit (“clo- sure”). In N ̄ag ̄arjuna’s case, these limital contradic- tions arise at the boundary between “conventional reality/truth” (sam. vr.ti-sat/satya) and “ultimate real- ity/truth” (param ̄artha-sat/satya). Ultimate truth is that things lack intrinsic nature (svabh ̄ava), i.e. that they are empty ( ́su ̄nya) of intrinsic nature. This empti- ness is universal and it includes emptiness itself (empti- ness of emptiness). But that means that being empty is intrinsic property of all things so it comes out that things both have (conventional truth) and lack (ul- timate truth) intrinsic nature. This is ontological paradox. DGP identify also semantic and express- ibility paradoxes in N ̄ag ̄arjuna. Although logically coherent and philosophically intriguing, I think that DGP’s interpretation nevertheless overlooks a spe- cial kind of semantics that, presumably, works be- hind N ̄ag ̄arjuna’s reasoning and that would be best described in terms of difference between first and sec- ond order statements, i.e. between terms referring to the world (primary system) and terms referring to the primary system (meta-system, comprising the “meta” concept of emptiness). Working in these two seman- tic levels N ̄ag ̄arjuna, I believe, escapes contradictions — and N ̄ag ̄arjuna is aware of them — that arise “at the limits of thought”.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski



POVEZANOST RADA


Profili:

Avatar Url Goran Kardaš (autor)

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Kardaš, Goran
Some (critical) remarks on Priest’s dialetheist reading of Nagarjuna // European journal of analytic philosophy, 11 (2015), 2; 35-49 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Kardaš, G. (2015) Some (critical) remarks on Priest’s dialetheist reading of Nagarjuna. European journal of analytic philosophy, 11 (2), 35-49.
@article{article, author = {Karda\v{s}, Goran}, year = {2015}, pages = {35-49}, keywords = {Nagarjuna, Candrakirti, emptiness, semantics, contradiction, paradox}, journal = {European journal of analytic philosophy}, volume = {11}, number = {2}, issn = {1845-8475}, title = {Some (critical) remarks on Priest’s dialetheist reading of Nagarjuna}, keyword = {Nagarjuna, Candrakirti, emptiness, semantics, contradiction, paradox} }
@article{article, author = {Karda\v{s}, Goran}, year = {2015}, pages = {35-49}, keywords = {Nagarjuna, Candrakirti, emptiness, semantics, contradiction, paradox}, journal = {European journal of analytic philosophy}, volume = {11}, number = {2}, issn = {1845-8475}, title = {Some (critical) remarks on Priest’s dialetheist reading of Nagarjuna}, keyword = {Nagarjuna, Candrakirti, emptiness, semantics, contradiction, paradox} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font