Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 913175

Diclofenac sodium versus ceftazidime for preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.


Hauser, Goran; Blažević, Ivana; Salkić, Nermin; Poropat, Goran; Giljača, Vanja; Bulić, Zlatko; Štimac, Davor
Diclofenac sodium versus ceftazidime for preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. // Surgical endoscopy, 31 (2017), 602-610 doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5004-9 (podatak o recenziji nije dostupan, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 913175 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Diclofenac sodium versus ceftazidime for preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Autori
Hauser, Goran ; Blažević, Ivana ; Salkić, Nermin ; Poropat, Goran ; Giljača, Vanja ; Bulić, Zlatko ; Štimac, Davor

Izvornik
Surgical endoscopy (0930-2794) 31 (2017); 602-610

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
ERCP, Post ERCP pancreatitis

Sažetak
Background and Aims: We aimed to compare the efficacy of prophylactic, parenterally administered ceftazidime and rectally applied diclofenac sodium for the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients who underwent ERCP. In a doubleblinded randomized controlled trial, patients received a suppository containing diclofenac sodium rectally (100 mg) and placebo intravenously (group A) or ceftazidime intravenously (1 g) and placebo rectally (group B) immediately before the procedure. The serum and urine amylase levels were recorded and the patients were clinically evaluated after ERCP. Results: Of the 272 patients enrolled (group A: 129 ; group B: 143), 32 developed pancreatitis (group A: 11 [8.5%] ; group B: 21 [14.7%] ; P = 0.17 ; relative risk = 1.72 ; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86-3.43). The severity of the pancreatitis or complications did not significantly differ between the groups. A serum amylase level of ≥ 560 U/L and urine amylase level of ≥ 1150 U/L indicated a positive likelihood ratio for post-ERCP pancreatitis of ≥ 10. Moreover, the threshold visual analog scale score of ≤ 5 for abdominal pain after ERCP had excellent diagnostic potential for predicting the presence or absence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Conclusions: The PEP incidence did not differ between the ceftazidime and diclofenac sodium groups. In patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug contraindications, antibiotics can be considered a safe alternative to diclofenac sodium for PEP prevention. Moreover, the visual analog scale for abdominal pain has excellent diagnostic value for predicting PEP. Clinical trials.gov number, NCT 01784445.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka,
Klinički bolnički centar Rijeka,
Fakultet zdravstvenih studija u Rijeci

Profili:

Avatar Url Goran Hauser (autor)

Avatar Url Vanja Giljača (autor)

Avatar Url Goran Poropat (autor)

Avatar Url Davor Štimac (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi link.springer.com

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Hauser, Goran; Blažević, Ivana; Salkić, Nermin; Poropat, Goran; Giljača, Vanja; Bulić, Zlatko; Štimac, Davor
Diclofenac sodium versus ceftazidime for preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. // Surgical endoscopy, 31 (2017), 602-610 doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5004-9 (podatak o recenziji nije dostupan, članak, znanstveni)
Hauser, G., Blažević, I., Salkić, N., Poropat, G., Giljača, V., Bulić, Z. & Štimac, D. (2017) Diclofenac sodium versus ceftazidime for preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.. Surgical endoscopy, 31, 602-610 doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5004-9.
@article{article, author = {Hauser, Goran and Bla\v{z}evi\'{c}, Ivana and Salki\'{c}, Nermin and Poropat, Goran and Gilja\v{c}a, Vanja and Buli\'{c}, Zlatko and \v{S}timac, Davor}, year = {2017}, pages = {602-610}, DOI = {10.1007/s00464-016-5004-9}, keywords = {ERCP, Post ERCP pancreatitis}, journal = {Surgical endoscopy}, doi = {10.1007/s00464-016-5004-9}, volume = {31}, issn = {0930-2794}, title = {Diclofenac sodium versus ceftazidime for preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.}, keyword = {ERCP, Post ERCP pancreatitis} }
@article{article, author = {Hauser, Goran and Bla\v{z}evi\'{c}, Ivana and Salki\'{c}, Nermin and Poropat, Goran and Gilja\v{c}a, Vanja and Buli\'{c}, Zlatko and \v{S}timac, Davor}, year = {2017}, pages = {602-610}, DOI = {10.1007/s00464-016-5004-9}, keywords = {ERCP, Post ERCP pancreatitis}, journal = {Surgical endoscopy}, doi = {10.1007/s00464-016-5004-9}, volume = {31}, issn = {0930-2794}, title = {Diclofenac sodium versus ceftazidime for preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.}, keyword = {ERCP, Post ERCP pancreatitis} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font