Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 900580

Empirical test of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory


Krupić, Dino
Empirical test of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, 2017., doktorska disertacija, Filozofski fakultet u Rijeci, Rijeka


CROSBI ID: 900580 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Empirical test of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory

Autori
Krupić, Dino

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Ocjenski radovi, doktorska disertacija

Fakultet
Filozofski fakultet u Rijeci

Mjesto
Rijeka

Datum
22.09

Godina
2017

Stranica
196

Mentor
Gračanin, Asmir

Ključne riječi
personality ; questionnaires ; neuropsychology ; psychometrics ; Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory ; BAS ; BIS ; FFFS

Sažetak
The relation between brain and personality is still undefined, and it seems that this topic has a long future in psychological research. This doctoral thesis focuses on the neuropsychological theory of personality – Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST). It recognises three main dimensions ; Behavioural Approach System (BAS), Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS) and Fight/Flight/Freezing System (FFFS). There are currently several competing questionnaires designed to measure these constructs. These questionnaires are frequently used interchangeably without evidence to what extent they converge. Thus the aim of this thesis is to examine whether the results of RST studies conducted with different RST-based questionnaires are comparable. The objective is to provide the theoretical framework to interpret results from RST studies conducted with different questionnaires and to provide suggestions for further development of RST and its psychometric instruments. Six studies were conducted to test convergent and predictive validity of RST questionnaires. The results showed that RST questionnaires should not be used interchangeably since: (a) they do not converge ; (b) their BIS and FFFS scales do not predict defensive behaviour in the same way ; (c) they do not predict emotional and motivational outcomes after performance feedback in the same way ; (d) constructs measured by different BAS scales do not serve the same evolutionary function. The dissertation acknowledges the existence of four types of the BAS scales and provides the theoretical framework to reinterpret earlier findings from RST studies conducted with different questionnaires. The BIS scales converged highly with only one exception, while the FFFS scales converge, but show significant weaknesses in examining the theory.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Psihologija



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Osijek

Profili:

Avatar Url Asmir Gračanin (mentor)

Avatar Url Dino Krupić (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

Pristup cjelovitom tekstu rada

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Krupić, Dino
Empirical test of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, 2017., doktorska disertacija, Filozofski fakultet u Rijeci, Rijeka
Krupić, D. (2017) 'Empirical test of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory', doktorska disertacija, Filozofski fakultet u Rijeci, Rijeka.
@phdthesis{phdthesis, author = {Krupi\'{c}, Dino}, year = {2017}, pages = {196}, keywords = {personality, questionnaires, neuropsychology, psychometrics, Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, BAS, BIS, FFFS}, title = {Empirical test of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory}, keyword = {personality, questionnaires, neuropsychology, psychometrics, Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, BAS, BIS, FFFS}, publisherplace = {Rijeka} }
@phdthesis{phdthesis, author = {Krupi\'{c}, Dino}, year = {2017}, pages = {196}, keywords = {personality, questionnaires, neuropsychology, psychometrics, Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, BAS, BIS, FFFS}, title = {Empirical test of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory}, keyword = {personality, questionnaires, neuropsychology, psychometrics, Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, BAS, BIS, FFFS}, publisherplace = {Rijeka} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font