Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 898561
Dominacija i nepokoravanje ili Postoje li "dobri muževi"? - Bourdieu, Foucault i feminizmi
Dominacija i nepokoravanje ili Postoje li "dobri muževi"? - Bourdieu, Foucault i feminizmi // Književna smotra : časopis za svjetsku književnost, 183 (2017), 1; 3-13 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 898561 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Dominacija i nepokoravanje ili Postoje li "dobri muževi"? - Bourdieu, Foucault i feminizmi
(Domination and Disobedience or Are there any "good husbands"? - Bourdieu, Foucault and Feminisms)
Autori
Vukušić Zorica, Maja
Izvornik
Književna smotra : časopis za svjetsku književnost (0455-0463) 183
(2017), 1;
3-13
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Foucault ; Bourdieu ; feminizam ; esencijalizacija ; aktivizam
(Foucault ; Bourdieu ; feminism ; essentialization ; activism)
Sažetak
Domination and Disobedience or Are there any “good husbands”? – Bourdieu, Foucault and Feminisms Feminist readings of Michel Foucault (The History of Sexuality, Discipline and Punish) and Pierre Bourdieu (Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Masculine Domination) raise the question of the possible combination of different discourses (philosophy, sociology, politics, ideology and activism) when dealing with the category of “sexuality” and “gender”. It seems as if one was considered having not said enough, and the other having said too much. Disobedience is embodied by those two very different figures of disobedience in a way to encourage the creation of new schemes of politicisation, new forms of culture, discourse and language indifferent to the gender (Foucault). Bourdieu’s intentions are more pragmatic, his ethos much less esthetical than Foucault’s. Foucault’s antiquity is Bourdieu’s Kabylia, the sign of the socialisation of the biological and the biologisation of the social. If Foucault analysis ruptures, limits and changes, Bourdieu analyses the stereotypes and the self-explanatory. Two “bad husbands” (Fraser) and bad “gurus” show that thinking about activism outside the framework of personal convictions and daily politics is very difficult, if not impossible. When confronted with feminisms, both of them underline the problem of thinking about a plural phenomenon that is both critical theory and political practice. Foucault once said that he always wrote only fiction. Literature may well be one way to outgrow these divisions, as the only potentially all-conquering language ; not as its own mystification, nor as the pathetic of all future possible, but as fiction that disables the classification of doubles: fiction and non-fiction, truth and history, narrative and storytelling.
Izvorni jezik
Hrvatski
Znanstvena područja
Filologija
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus