Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 887136

FREE TESTOSTERONE – ULTRAFILTRATION VS CALCULATED RESULTS


Mandić, Sanja; Mandić, Dario; Lukić, Iva; Horvat, Vesna; Pavošević, Tihana; Šahinović, Ines; Šerić, Vatroslav
FREE TESTOSTERONE – ULTRAFILTRATION VS CALCULATED RESULTS // Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Atena, Grčka, 2017. str. S638-S638 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, ostalo)


CROSBI ID: 887136 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
FREE TESTOSTERONE – ULTRAFILTRATION VS CALCULATED RESULTS

Autori
Mandić, Sanja ; Mandić, Dario ; Lukić, Iva ; Horvat, Vesna ; Pavošević, Tihana ; Šahinović, Ines ; Šerić, Vatroslav

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, ostalo

Izvornik
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine / - , 2017, S638-S638

Skup
22nd IFCC-EFLM European Congress of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 25th Meeting of the Balkan Clinical Laboratory Federation 15th National Congress of GSCC-CB

Mjesto i datum
Atena, Grčka, 11.06.2017. - 15.06.2017

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
free testosterone, ultrafiltration, calculated results

Sažetak
Background Testosterone circulates in the bloodstream as protein-bound and free form. Only the free testosterone (fT) is thought to be the biologically active component. Several mathematical calculations are routinely used for its assessment, because a reference method is time-consuming and unsuitable for routine. Previously, comparing the two published algorithms for calculating fT, we obtained results disagreement only among men population. The purpose of this study was to compare calculated fT results with those measured using centrifugal ultrafiltration method. Methods As a part of the hormonal status evaluation we analyzed fT in 20 males (mean age 35 years). Serum samples were collected according to a standard operating procedure using a blood activator tubes (Becton- Dickinson, Eysins, Switzerland). Testosterone and sex hormone- binding globulin were measured using chemiluminiscent microparticle immunoassay on ARCHITECT i1000SR (Abbott Diagnostics, Lake Forest, IL, USA), while albumin was determined using the Beckman Coulter AU480 (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA) analyzer. For calculating fT two different published algorithms (Vermeulen eta al. and Ly et al.) were used, whereupon results were compared with concentrations obtained after centrifugal ultrafiltration using Centrifree ultrafiltration devices (EMD Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer protocol. Statistical analysis was conducted by MedCalc for Windows, version 12.4.0 (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium). Results There was statistically significant difference in fT median values obtained by different approaches (Kruskal-Wallis test: 0.230 nmol/L after ultrafiltration vs calculated fT 0.740 nmol/L and 0.505 nmol/L ; P<0.001). However, a very strong correlation between fT values measured after centrifugal ultrafiltration and those obtained by one of the used mathematical algorithm was achieved (r=0.896, P<0.001). Conclusion Results demonstrated that used algorithms are in strong disagreement with the method of centrifugal ultrafiltration for determination of fT. Since centrifugal ultrafiltration procedure is relatively simple and available, it could be a good choice for accurate measurement of fT.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Klinički bolnički centar Osijek,
Medicinski fakultet, Osijek


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Mandić, Sanja; Mandić, Dario; Lukić, Iva; Horvat, Vesna; Pavošević, Tihana; Šahinović, Ines; Šerić, Vatroslav
FREE TESTOSTERONE – ULTRAFILTRATION VS CALCULATED RESULTS // Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Atena, Grčka, 2017. str. S638-S638 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, ostalo)
Mandić, S., Mandić, D., Lukić, I., Horvat, V., Pavošević, T., Šahinović, I. & Šerić, V. (2017) FREE TESTOSTERONE – ULTRAFILTRATION VS CALCULATED RESULTS. U: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
@article{article, author = {Mandi\'{c}, Sanja and Mandi\'{c}, Dario and Luki\'{c}, Iva and Horvat, Vesna and Pavo\v{s}evi\'{c}, Tihana and \v{S}ahinovi\'{c}, Ines and \v{S}eri\'{c}, Vatroslav}, year = {2017}, pages = {S638-S638}, keywords = {free testosterone, ultrafiltration, calculated results}, title = {FREE TESTOSTERONE – ULTRAFILTRATION VS CALCULATED RESULTS}, keyword = {free testosterone, ultrafiltration, calculated results}, publisherplace = {Atena, Gr\v{c}ka} }
@article{article, author = {Mandi\'{c}, Sanja and Mandi\'{c}, Dario and Luki\'{c}, Iva and Horvat, Vesna and Pavo\v{s}evi\'{c}, Tihana and \v{S}ahinovi\'{c}, Ines and \v{S}eri\'{c}, Vatroslav}, year = {2017}, pages = {S638-S638}, keywords = {free testosterone, ultrafiltration, calculated results}, title = {FREE TESTOSTERONE – ULTRAFILTRATION VS CALCULATED RESULTS}, keyword = {free testosterone, ultrafiltration, calculated results}, publisherplace = {Atena, Gr\v{c}ka} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE





Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font