Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 8870
Comparison of Different Models in Case of Plomin Site Contamination Analysis
Comparison of Different Models in Case of Plomin Site Contamination Analysis // Treći simpozij Hrvatskog društva za zaštitu od zračenja / Kubelka, Dragan ; Kovač, Jadranka (ur.).
Zagreb, Hrvatska: Hrvatsko društvo za zaštitu od zračenja, 1996. str. 353-363 (predavanje, nije recenziran, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), stručni)
CROSBI ID: 8870 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparison of Different Models in Case of Plomin Site Contamination Analysis
Autori
Škanata, Dejan ; Šinka, Davor ; Lokner, Vladimir ; Schaller, Antun
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), stručni
Izvornik
Treći simpozij Hrvatskog društva za zaštitu od zračenja
/ Kubelka, Dragan ; Kovač, Jadranka - : Hrvatsko društvo za zaštitu od zračenja, 1996, 353-363
Skup
Treći simpozij Hrvatskog društva za zaštitu od zračenja
Mjesto i datum
Zagreb, Hrvatska, 20.11.1996. - 22.11.1996
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Nije recenziran
Ključne riječi
radioactively contaminated sites; clean-up; RESRAD; GENII; PATHRAE
Sažetak
In the past few years radioactively contaminated sites and their clean-up have made it to the list of topical
environmental issues with both professionals as well as general public. TE Plomin site, situated in the western littoral area
of the Istrian peninsula, some ten kilometres north-west to the town of Labin, within the complex of the power plant carrying
the same name, is a good example of such a site. It contains 700.000 m3 of radioactively contaminated slag and ash, covering
the area of 120.000 m2. Slag and ash have continuously been accumulated there since 1971 as a result of burning coal with
naturally elevated radioactivity level in the boiler plant.
Application of quantitative methods for the assessment of impacts on human health and environment is a crucial step in
the process of making a decision on possible clean-up procedures of contaminated sites. That is why a number of models
have been designed, each of them tackling the problem in a different way, within a more or less limited scope, with a higher
or lower level of precision.
In the case of TE Plomin site doses were calculated by RESRAD and GENII computer codes and PATHRAE method.
Doses received are relevant to an individual who spends some time at the site every day, and they are inclusive of contributions
from the direct radiation of the deposited material and inhalation of contaminated particles.
The highest cumulative doses were obtained by RESRAD code, and the lowest by GENII code. It has been established that,
regardless of the method or code applied, the doses received from the direct radiation of deposited material are several times
higher than the doses received by inhaling contaminated particles. It has also been established that aberrations encountered in
cumulative doses are due to differences in models and dose conversion factors for the calculation of doses from the direct
radiation.
Generally speaking, it can be said that uncertainty of input data determines the level of conservativeness in the approach
to analysis. Since in this case the uncertainty of some input data was substantial (this refers to specific activity of radionuclides,
concentration of contaminated particles in the air, as well to a series of data associated with the exposure scenario), the authors
feel that the results obtained by the RESRAD code should be considered more reliable than the others.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Elektrotehnika