Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 864734

One test, five scoring procedures: different ways of approaching the cognitive reflection test


Erceg, Nikola; Bubić, Andreja
One test, five scoring procedures: different ways of approaching the cognitive reflection test // Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29 (2017), 3; 381-392 doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1278004 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 864734 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
One test, five scoring procedures: different ways of approaching the cognitive reflection test

Autori
Erceg, Nikola ; Bubić, Andreja

Izvornik
Journal of Cognitive Psychology (2044-5911) 29 (2017), 3; 381-392

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Cognitive reflection, faith in intuition, maximising, need for cognition ; regretthinking dispositions

Sažetak
Although the cognitive reflection test (CRT) represents a frequently used instrument within the field of judgement and decision-making, its scope and detailed characteristics are still not well understood. Therefore, the present article discusses 5 different ways of scoring the CRT that include the regular CRT scoring procedure (CRT-Regular), adding up the intuitive answers (CRT-Intuitive), calculating the proportion of intuitive in total incorrect answers (CRT-Proportion Intuitive), scoring only non-intuitive answers irrespective of their correctness (CRT-Reflection) and calculating the proportion of correct in total non-intuitive answers (CRT-Calculation). We conducted 2 studies aimed at investigating the associations among these scoring techniques and their relationships with thinking dispositions, specifically the need for cognition, faith in intuition, superstitious thinking, maximising and post-choice regret. The results indicate that thinking dispositions play a modest role in explaining the performance on the CRT. The specific associations among the investigated dispositions and different CRT scoring techniques are discussed.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Psihologija



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet u Splitu

Profili:

Avatar Url Andreja Bubić (autor)

Avatar Url Nikola Erceg (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi dx.doi.org www.tandfonline.com

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Erceg, Nikola; Bubić, Andreja
One test, five scoring procedures: different ways of approaching the cognitive reflection test // Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29 (2017), 3; 381-392 doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1278004 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Erceg, N. & Bubić, A. (2017) One test, five scoring procedures: different ways of approaching the cognitive reflection test. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29 (3), 381-392 doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1278004.
@article{article, author = {Erceg, Nikola and Bubi\'{c}, Andreja}, year = {2017}, pages = {381-392}, DOI = {10.1080/20445911.2016.1278004}, keywords = {Cognitive reflection, faith in intuition, maximising, need for cognition, regretthinking dispositions}, journal = {Journal of Cognitive Psychology}, doi = {10.1080/20445911.2016.1278004}, volume = {29}, number = {3}, issn = {2044-5911}, title = {One test, five scoring procedures: different ways of approaching the cognitive reflection test}, keyword = {Cognitive reflection, faith in intuition, maximising, need for cognition, regretthinking dispositions} }
@article{article, author = {Erceg, Nikola and Bubi\'{c}, Andreja}, year = {2017}, pages = {381-392}, DOI = {10.1080/20445911.2016.1278004}, keywords = {Cognitive reflection, faith in intuition, maximising, need for cognition, regretthinking dispositions}, journal = {Journal of Cognitive Psychology}, doi = {10.1080/20445911.2016.1278004}, volume = {29}, number = {3}, issn = {2044-5911}, title = {One test, five scoring procedures: different ways of approaching the cognitive reflection test}, keyword = {Cognitive reflection, faith in intuition, maximising, need for cognition, regretthinking dispositions} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font