Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 860440

Complications, Pain Control, and Patient Recovery After Local Versus General Anesthesia for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Adults— Systematic Review and Meta-analysis


Bakota, Bore; Kopljar, Mario; Šimić, Diana; Franić, Miljenko; Starešinić, Mario; Patrlj, Leonardo
Complications, Pain Control, and Patient Recovery After Local Versus General Anesthesia for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Adults— Systematic Review and Meta-analysis // International surgery, 101 (2016), 3/4; 144-152 doi:10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 860440 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Complications, Pain Control, and Patient Recovery After Local Versus General Anesthesia for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Adults— Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Autori
Bakota, Bore ; Kopljar, Mario ; Šimić, Diana ; Franić, Miljenko ; Starešinić, Mario ; Patrlj, Leonardo

Izvornik
International surgery (0020-8868) 101 (2016), 3/4; 144-152

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Hernia, General anesthesia, Local anesthesia, Complications, Meta-analysis

Sažetak
The purpose of this systematic review is to provide an “up-to-date” evidence-based guideline and clarify the possible benefits as well as drawbacks of local anesthesia (LA) and general anesthesia (GA) in open inguinal hernia surgery in adults. Study method comprised randomized controlled trials. Primary outcome measures were complications, pain control, and patient recovery. Secondary outcome measures were patient satisfaction and hernia recurrence. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials contributed to the study. A total of 1677 patients were analyzed, with 953 in the LA group and 724 in the GA group. Complications were statistically less frequent in the LA group compared with the GA group [odds ratio (OR), 0.31 ; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.15, 0.64). Supplemental intraoperative analgesia had a statistical significance in the LA group, with an OR of 28.93 (95% CI, 7.86, 106.47). Postoperative pain was statistically significantly lower in the LA group [standardized eman difference (SMD), −1.06 ; 95% CI, −1.64, −0.48)]. Length of stay was shorter for patients who underwent operation under LA compared with those receiving GA (OR, −1.21 ; 95% CI, −2.08, −0.33]). Time to full mobility was shorter in the LA group, without statistical significance (OR, 3.04 ; 95% CI, 0.19, 47.90), whereas measuring in SMD showed significance in comparison with GA (SMD, −1.74 ; 95% CI, −2.34, −1.14). Hernia recurrence was not noted. Patient satisfaction was greater in the LA group (SMD, 0.65 ; 95% CI, 0.15, 1.15). Compared with GA, LA showed superiority in terms of complications, postoperative pain, length of stay, time to full mobility, and patient satisfaction. Therefore, it appears to be a more appropriate anesthetic technique for open inguinal hernia repair in adults.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Informacijske i komunikacijske znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Fakultet organizacije i informatike, Varaždin,
Klinička bolnica "Merkur",
Klinička bolnica "Dubrava",
Klinički bolnički centar Zagreb,
Medicinski fakultet, Osijek,
Opća bolnica Karlovac

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi dx.doi.org www.internationalsurgery.org

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Bakota, Bore; Kopljar, Mario; Šimić, Diana; Franić, Miljenko; Starešinić, Mario; Patrlj, Leonardo
Complications, Pain Control, and Patient Recovery After Local Versus General Anesthesia for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Adults— Systematic Review and Meta-analysis // International surgery, 101 (2016), 3/4; 144-152 doi:10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Bakota, B., Kopljar, M., Šimić, D., Franić, M., Starešinić, M. & Patrlj, L. (2016) Complications, Pain Control, and Patient Recovery After Local Versus General Anesthesia for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Adults— Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. International surgery, 101 (3/4), 144-152 doi:10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1.
@article{article, author = {Bakota, Bore and Kopljar, Mario and \v{S}imi\'{c}, Diana and Frani\'{c}, Miljenko and Stare\v{s}ini\'{c}, Mario and Patrlj, Leonardo}, year = {2016}, pages = {144-152}, DOI = {10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1}, keywords = {Hernia, General anesthesia, Local anesthesia, Complications, Meta-analysis}, journal = {International surgery}, doi = {10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1}, volume = {101}, number = {3/4}, issn = {0020-8868}, title = {Complications, Pain Control, and Patient Recovery After Local Versus General Anesthesia for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Adults— Systematic Review and Meta-analysis}, keyword = {Hernia, General anesthesia, Local anesthesia, Complications, Meta-analysis} }
@article{article, author = {Bakota, Bore and Kopljar, Mario and \v{S}imi\'{c}, Diana and Frani\'{c}, Miljenko and Stare\v{s}ini\'{c}, Mario and Patrlj, Leonardo}, year = {2016}, pages = {144-152}, DOI = {10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1}, keywords = {Hernia, General anesthesia, Local anesthesia, Complications, Meta-analysis}, journal = {International surgery}, doi = {10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00065.1}, volume = {101}, number = {3/4}, issn = {0020-8868}, title = {Complications, Pain Control, and Patient Recovery After Local Versus General Anesthesia for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Adults— Systematic Review and Meta-analysis}, keyword = {Hernia, General anesthesia, Local anesthesia, Complications, Meta-analysis} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka::


  • MEDLINE


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font