Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 858252

Jurisdiction in internet defamation cases and CJEU's policy choices


Kunda, Ivana; Vrbljanac Danijela
Jurisdiction in internet defamation cases and CJEU's policy choices // Economic integrations, competition and cooperation/Intégrations économiques, concurrence et cooperation / Kandžija, Vinko ; Kumar, Sndrej (ur.).
Nica: CEMAFI International, 2016. str. 739-756 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 858252 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Jurisdiction in internet defamation cases and CJEU's policy choices

Autori
Kunda, Ivana ; Vrbljanac Danijela

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni

Izvornik
Economic integrations, competition and cooperation/Intégrations économiques, concurrence et cooperation / Kandžija, Vinko ; Kumar, Sndrej - Nica : CEMAFI International, 2016, 739-756

ISBN
978-2-9544508-9-6

Skup
10th International Conference European Integration, Competition and Cooperation: Accession of the Western Balkan Region to the European Union

Mjesto i datum
Opatija, Hrvatska, 22.04.2015. - 24.04.2015

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
European law, personality rights, international jurisdiction, Internet, underlying principles, media

Sažetak
The Brussels I bis Regulation (1215/2012), sequel to the Brussels I Regulation (44/2000), contains rules on international jurisdiction of the EU Member States’ courts in cross-border cases. Although the EU provision on jurisdiction for non-contractual cases follows the same principle as the respective Croatian national provision, its interpretation goes much beyond its actual wording. There is a growing number of cases related to violation of rights over the Internet, and in particular with the manner in which the jurisdictional provision based on a traditional territorial connection might be adjusted to the online environment. In its rulings, the CJEU regularly applies the purposive interpretation rather than strictly literal one, thus allowing flexibility in reading the existing provisions. In doing so, the CJEU necessarily takes account of the underlying economic and social as well as private interests. The purpose of this paper is to scrutinize the operation of the special jurisdictional provision for torts in Internet defamation cases and assess its socio-economic implications over the stakeholders. Application of those provisions poses challenges not only to legal practitioners, but also to media industry and individuals in Croatia.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Pravo



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
HRZZ-IP-2013-11-9366 - Pravni aspekti korporativnih akvizicija i restrukturiranje trgovačkih društava utemeljeno na znanju (LACAKDCR) (Čulinović-Herc, Edita, HRZZ - 2013-11) ( CroRIS)

Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Rijeka

Profili:

Avatar Url Danijela Vrbljanac (autor)

Avatar Url Ivana Kunda (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

Pristup cjelovitom tekstu rada

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Kunda, Ivana; Vrbljanac Danijela
Jurisdiction in internet defamation cases and CJEU's policy choices // Economic integrations, competition and cooperation/Intégrations économiques, concurrence et cooperation / Kandžija, Vinko ; Kumar, Sndrej (ur.).
Nica: CEMAFI International, 2016. str. 739-756 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
Kunda, I. & Vrbljanac Danijela (2016) Jurisdiction in internet defamation cases and CJEU's policy choices. U: Kandžija, V. & Kumar, S. (ur.)Economic integrations, competition and cooperation/Intégrations économiques, concurrence et cooperation.
@article{article, author = {Kunda, Ivana}, year = {2016}, pages = {739-756}, keywords = {European law, personality rights, international jurisdiction, Internet, underlying principles, media}, isbn = {978-2-9544508-9-6}, title = {Jurisdiction in internet defamation cases and CJEU's policy choices}, keyword = {European law, personality rights, international jurisdiction, Internet, underlying principles, media}, publisher = {CEMAFI International}, publisherplace = {Opatija, Hrvatska} }
@article{article, author = {Kunda, Ivana}, year = {2016}, pages = {739-756}, keywords = {European law, personality rights, international jurisdiction, Internet, underlying principles, media}, isbn = {978-2-9544508-9-6}, title = {Jurisdiction in internet defamation cases and CJEU's policy choices}, keyword = {European law, personality rights, international jurisdiction, Internet, underlying principles, media}, publisher = {CEMAFI International}, publisherplace = {Opatija, Hrvatska} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font