Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 858252
Jurisdiction in internet defamation cases and CJEU's policy choices
Jurisdiction in internet defamation cases and CJEU's policy choices // Economic integrations, competition and cooperation/Intégrations économiques, concurrence et cooperation / Kandžija, Vinko ; Kumar, Sndrej (ur.).
Nica: CEMAFI International, 2016. str. 739-756 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 858252 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Jurisdiction in internet defamation cases and CJEU's policy choices
Autori
Kunda, Ivana ; Vrbljanac Danijela
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Economic integrations, competition and cooperation/Intégrations économiques, concurrence et cooperation
/ Kandžija, Vinko ; Kumar, Sndrej - Nica : CEMAFI International, 2016, 739-756
ISBN
978-2-9544508-9-6
Skup
10th International Conference European Integration, Competition and Cooperation: Accession of the Western Balkan Region to the European Union
Mjesto i datum
Opatija, Hrvatska, 22.04.2015. - 24.04.2015
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
European law, personality rights, international jurisdiction, Internet, underlying principles, media
Sažetak
The Brussels I bis Regulation (1215/2012), sequel to the Brussels I Regulation (44/2000), contains rules on international jurisdiction of the EU Member States’ courts in cross-border cases. Although the EU provision on jurisdiction for non-contractual cases follows the same principle as the respective Croatian national provision, its interpretation goes much beyond its actual wording. There is a growing number of cases related to violation of rights over the Internet, and in particular with the manner in which the jurisdictional provision based on a traditional territorial connection might be adjusted to the online environment. In its rulings, the CJEU regularly applies the purposive interpretation rather than strictly literal one, thus allowing flexibility in reading the existing provisions. In doing so, the CJEU necessarily takes account of the underlying economic and social as well as private interests. The purpose of this paper is to scrutinize the operation of the special jurisdictional provision for torts in Internet defamation cases and assess its socio-economic implications over the stakeholders. Application of those provisions poses challenges not only to legal practitioners, but also to media industry and individuals in Croatia.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
HRZZ-IP-2013-11-9366 - Pravni aspekti korporativnih akvizicija i restrukturiranje trgovačkih društava utemeljeno na znanju (LACAKDCR) (Čulinović-Herc, Edita, HRZZ - 2013-11) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Rijeka