Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 857349
Y-chromosomal haplogroup distribution in the Tuzla Canton of Bosnia and Herzegovina : A concordance study using four different in silico assignment algorithms based on Y-STR data
Y-chromosomal haplogroup distribution in the Tuzla Canton of Bosnia and Herzegovina : A concordance study using four different in silico assignment algorithms based on Y-STR data // Homo (Stuttgart), 67 (2016), 6; 471-483 doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2016.10.003 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 857349 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Y-chromosomal haplogroup distribution in the Tuzla Canton of Bosnia and Herzegovina : A concordance study using four different in silico assignment algorithms based on Y-STR data
Autori
Dogan, Serkan ; Babić, Naida ; Gurkan, C. ; Goksu, A. ; Marjanović, Damir ; Hadžiavdić, Vesna
Izvornik
Homo (Stuttgart) (0018-442X) 67
(2016), 6;
471-483
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Y-chromosome, Y-STR data, Tuzla Canton
Sažetak
Y-chromosomal haplogroups are sets of ancestrally related paternal lineages, traditionally assigned by the use of Y-chromosomal single nucleotide polymorphism (Y-SNP) markers. An increasingly popular and a less labor-intensive alternative approach has been Y-chromosomal haplogroup assignment based on already available Y-STR data using a variety of different algorithms. In the present study, such in silico haplogroup assignments were made based on 23-loci Y-STR data for 100 unrelated male individuals from the Tuzla Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) using the following four different algorithms: Whit Athey's Haplogroup Predictor, Jim Cullen's World Haplogroup & Haplogroup-I Subclade Predictor, Vadim Urasin's YPredictor and the NevGen Y-DNA Haplogroup Predictor. Prior in-house assessment of these four different algorithms using a previously published dataset (n = 132) from B&H with both Y- STR (12-loci) and Y-SNP data suggested haplogroup misassignment rates between 0.76% and 3.02%. Subsequent analyses with the Tuzla Canton population sample revealed only a few differences in the individual haplogroup assignments when using different algorithms. Nevertheless, the resultant Y-chromosomal haplogroup distribution by each method was very similar, where the most prevalent haplogroups observed were I, R and E with their sublineages I2a, R1a and E1b1b, respectively, which is also in accordance with the previously published Y-SNP data for the B&H population. In conclusion, results presented herein not only constitute a concordance study on the four most popular haplogroup assignment algorithms, but they also give a deeper insight into the inter-population differentiation in B&H on the basis of Y haplogroups for the first time.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE