Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 855203
Diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound for diagnosis of acute appendicitis : systematic review and meta-analysis
Diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound for diagnosis of acute appendicitis : systematic review and meta-analysis // World journal of surgery, 41 (2017), 693-700 doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3792-7 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 855203 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound for
diagnosis of acute appendicitis : systematic
review
and meta-analysis
Autori
Giljača, Vanja ; Nadarević, Tin ; Poropat, Goran ; Nadarević, VS ; Štimac, Davor
Izvornik
World journal of surgery (0364-2313) 41
(2017);
693-700
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
acute appendicitis ; abdominal ultrasound ; diagnosis ; meta-analysis
Sažetak
Background was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound (US) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA), in terms of sensitivity, specificity and post-test probabilities for positive and negative result. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane library and Science Citation Index Expanded from January 1994 to October 2014 was performed. Two authors independently evaluated studies for inclusion, extracted data and performed analyses. The reference standard for evaluation of final diagnosis was pathohistological report on tissue obtained at appendectomy. Summary sensitivity, specificity and post-test probability of AA after positive and negative result of US with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Out of 3306 references identified through electronic searches, 17 reports met the inclusion criteria, with 2841 included participants. The summary sensitivity and specificity of US for diagnosis of AA were 69% (95% CI 59-78%) and 81% (95% CI 73-88%), respectively. At the median pretest probability of AA of 76.4%, the post-test probability for a positive and negative result of US was 92% (95% CI 88-95%) and 55% (95% CI 46-63%), respectively. Abdominal ultrasound does not seem to have a role in the diagnostic pathway for diagnosis of AA in suspected patients. The summary sensitivity and specificity of US do not exceed that of physical examination. Patients that require additional diagnostic workup should be referred to more sensitive and specific diagnostic procedures, such as computed tomography.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka,
Klinički bolnički centar Rijeka
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE