Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 849697
Analysis of different sources of measurement error in determining second-to-fourth digit ratio, a potential indicator of perinatal sex hormones exposure
Analysis of different sources of measurement error in determining second-to-fourth digit ratio, a potential indicator of perinatal sex hormones exposure // Review of psychology, 23 (2016), 1-2; 39-49 doi:10.21465/rp0023.0004 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 849697 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Analysis of different sources of measurement
error in determining second-to-fourth digit
ratio, a potential indicator of perinatal sex
hormones exposure
Autori
Mikac, Una ; Buško, Vesna ; Sommer, Werner ; Hildebrandt, Andrea
Izvornik
Review of psychology (1330-6812) 23
(2016), 1-2;
39-49
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
2D:4D measurement ; reliability ; rater effects ; software
Sažetak
Brain structures change in a consistent way due to perinatal and pubertal sex hormones exposure. Data on these changes and their influence on human behaviour, called organisational effects of sex hormones, are difficult to obtain. One potential indicator is the second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D). Measurement of 2D:4D has recently gathered support based on evidence concerning its validity. Available research on its reliability indicated that software methods of determining finger length are more reliable than direct measurements and that inter-rater reliability varied .60–.90. The present research focused on both of these aspects simultaneously, the retest reliability of software measures, and the comparison of software methods using a balanced design. Two scans, each of left and right hands of 213 participants, were collected following methodological recommendations from previous research. Length estimates followed a balanced design with at least six ratings per participant, varying with regard to scan, software method (GIMP or AutoMetric) and the number of raters. At least two raters were involved for each participant. Reli-ability analysis mostly indicated strong concordance between raters, methods, and scans. We discuss implications for assessing multiple sources of measurement error on continuous rating measures in general, and for measuring 2D:4D in special.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Psihologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb