Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 842331

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN THE CATALOGS OF NATIONAL AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES


Kurtović, Ileana; Špiranec, Sonja
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN THE CATALOGS OF NATIONAL AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES // BOBCATSSSS 2014- Library (r)evolution: Promoting sustainable information practices
Barcelona, Španjolska, 2014. (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 842331 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN THE CATALOGS OF NATIONAL AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES

Autori
Kurtović, Ileana ; Špiranec, Sonja

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni

Izvornik
BOBCATSSSS 2014- Library (r)evolution: Promoting sustainable information practices / - , 2014

Skup
BOBCATSSSS 2014- Library (r)evolution: Promoting sustainable information practices

Mjesto i datum
Barcelona, Španjolska, 29.01.2014. - 31.01.2014

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
Library 2.0; national library; public library; catalog 2.0; web 2.0

Sažetak
This paper analyzes the way in which libraries are using Web 2.0 tools within catalogs and for what purpose. Traditional functions of library catalogs are changing by supplementing the predominate search/find function with features that enable communication among users. By using Web 2.0 elements the catalog becomes a place of interaction that allows users to submit their own content. The paper introduction of new elements in library catalog enables the sustainability of the system and library as a whole. The main question that guide our research are: Do public libraries use Web 2.0 tools more than national libraries? Are there differences in the kind of tools with regard to the type of library? What is the basic purpose of the tools used in library catalog? Paper explores the connection between the guidelines for national and public libraries with regard to the use of Web 2.0 tools in their catalogs. The study includes data from 28 countries of European Union, one national library in each country and one public library. Hypothesis is that public libraries use more Web 2.0 tools than the national libraries. It stems from the fact that there is a necessity of the public libraries for greater user flexibility than is the case with the national libraries.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Informacijske i komunikacijske znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Sonja Špiranec (autor)

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Kurtović, Ileana; Špiranec, Sonja
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN THE CATALOGS OF NATIONAL AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES // BOBCATSSSS 2014- Library (r)evolution: Promoting sustainable information practices
Barcelona, Španjolska, 2014. (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
Kurtović, I. & Špiranec, S. (2014) DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN THE CATALOGS OF NATIONAL AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES. U: BOBCATSSSS 2014- Library (r)evolution: Promoting sustainable information practices.
@article{article, author = {Kurtovi\'{c}, Ileana and \v{S}piranec, Sonja}, year = {2014}, keywords = {Library 2.0, national library, public library, catalog 2.0, web 2.0}, title = {DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN THE CATALOGS OF NATIONAL AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES}, keyword = {Library 2.0, national library, public library, catalog 2.0, web 2.0}, publisherplace = {Barcelona, \v{S}panjolska} }
@article{article, author = {Kurtovi\'{c}, Ileana and \v{S}piranec, Sonja}, year = {2014}, keywords = {Library 2.0, national library, public library, catalog 2.0, web 2.0}, title = {DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN THE CATALOGS OF NATIONAL AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES}, keyword = {Library 2.0, national library, public library, catalog 2.0, web 2.0}, publisherplace = {Barcelona, \v{S}panjolska} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font