Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 837660
Quality Assessment of an Automatic Sounding Selection Process for Navigational Charts
Quality Assessment of an Automatic Sounding Selection Process for Navigational Charts // Cartographic journal, 54 (2017), 2; 139-146 doi:10.1080/00087041.2016.1195031 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 837660 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Quality Assessment of an Automatic Sounding Selection Process for Navigational Charts
Autori
Lovrinčević, Dejan
Izvornik
Cartographic journal (0008-7041) 54
(2017), 2;
139-146
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
nautical cartography ; navigation charts ; automatic sounding selection ; quality assessment
Sažetak
A good seabed representation is one of the important characteristics of any navigational chart. Along with depth contours and coloured depth areas, soundings are used for this task. All the soundings on a navigational chart are selected for a reason. Soundings contribute to the navigational chart safety aspect by alerting to all the threats and dangers. They also show all the attributes of a seabed relief without overcrowding it, thus maintaining the overall chart quality. Soundings are selected from a hydrographic survey and since it consists of a vast number of data, the process of sounding selection is a challenging and demanding task. It requires experience and knowledge from the nautical cartographer and is mostly done manually. Some types of software nowadays provide an automatic selection feature. This paper analyses a process of automatic sounding selection in the dKart Editor software. On the Croatian side of the Adriatic Sea, Šibenski Kanal (Šibenik channel) and Kanal Sv. Ante (St. Ante’s channel) are used as the study area. A hydrographic survey of the area represents the input data. The official navigational chart of the surveyed area is used as the basis for determining three different sets of parameters for the selection process. After the selection, obtained results are assessed based on geometrical accuracy and on the conservation level of navigational safety. For geometrical accuracy, the best results were produced by the third set that was divided in two subsets for each channel. It was determined that the nature of the seabed relief had an impact on the selection process. The same set had the best result for navigational safety assessment but it was concluded that all the sets undermined the aspect. Because of these crucial shortcomings noticed in all the tested sets of parameters, the feature is considered inadequate for serious usage as a completely automatic tool for the process of sounding selection on navigational charts.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Geodezija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Hrvatski hidrografski institut
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus