Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 827799
The Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Patients with Drug-Induced Hyposalivation: A Pilot Study
The Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Patients with Drug-Induced Hyposalivation: A Pilot Study // Photomedicine and laser surgery, 34 (2016), 9; 389-393 doi:10.1089/pho.2016.4109 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 827799 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
The Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Patients with Drug-Induced Hyposalivation: A Pilot Study
Autori
Terlević Dabić, Dijana ; Jurišić, Sanja ; Vučićević Boras, Vanja ; Gabrić, Dragana ; Bago, Ivona ; Vrdoljak Velimir, Danko
Izvornik
Photomedicine and laser surgery (1549-5418) 34
(2016), 9;
389-393
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
laser therapy ; LLLT ; hyposalivation
Sažetak
The aim of this study was to compare switched on and switched off (sham) low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of drug- induced hyposalivation. Hyposalivation is decreased salivary flow rate most frequently present in patients who take a lot of medication, suffer from Sjögren's syndrome, or were irradiated. Available therapies provide only short-term relief. Forty-three participants (40 females and 3 males, average age 72.3 ± 8.9) participated in the study. Before therapy or after therapy, every participant fulfilled quality-of-life assessment scale (OHIP- CRO14). Unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates were measured before and after treatment. The LLLT was performed by the use of gallium-aluminum-arsenide (GaAlAs) laser (830 nm) on parotid, submandibular, and sublingual glands every day except during weekends for 14 days. Significant difference in unstimulated salivary flow rate after the treatment was found in the study group (p = 0.002) compared with the sham group. No significant difference in stimulated salivary flow rate after treatment was found in the laser group (p = 0.626) nor in the sham laser group (p = 0.233). No significant difference in patient's quality- of-life score was found after both treatments. The results of this study showed that the LLLT increased unstimulated salivary flow rate significantly. However, stimulated salivary flow rate did not increase significantly after the LLLT. In patients who underwent sham laser therapy, neither unstimulated nor stimulated salivary flow rate increased significantly.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Dentalna medicina
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
065-0000000-0424 - Cijeljenje koštanog defekta nakon imedijatne implantacije (Katanec, Davor, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Stomatološki fakultet, Zagreb
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE