Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 825660

Opinion 2/13 on the EU accession to the ECHR


Petrašević, Tunjica; Duić, Dunja
Opinion 2/13 on the EU accession to the ECHR // New Developments in the EU Labour, Equality and Human Rights Law / Mario Vinković (ur.).
Osijek: J J Strossmayer University of Osijek Faculty of Law, 2015. str. 251-267 (pozvano predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), ostalo)


CROSBI ID: 825660 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Opinion 2/13 on the EU accession to the ECHR

Autori
Petrašević, Tunjica ; Duić, Dunja

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), ostalo

Izvornik
New Developments in the EU Labour, Equality and Human Rights Law / Mario Vinković - Osijek : J J Strossmayer University of Osijek Faculty of Law, 2015, 251-267

ISBN
978-953-8109-03-4

Skup
New Developments in the EU Labour, Equality and Human Rights Law

Mjesto i datum
Osijek, Hrvatska, 21.05.2015. - 22.05.2015

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Pozvano predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
European Convention on Human Rights; EU accession to ECHR; Opinion 2/13; Court of Justice; Protocol No 16; CFSP

Sažetak
On 18 December 2014 the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered Opinion 2/13 on the European Union’s accession to the European Convention on Human rights (ECHR). The Court ruled that the Draft Agreement on the Accession of the EU to the ECHR was incompatible with EU legal order. Opinion 2/13 is complex decision which finds the conflict with the Treaties on several main grounds: violation of the integrity and autonomy of the EU legal order ; institutional innovations that were included in the Accession Agreement and are not compatible with EU legal order and the specific characteristics of EU law as regards judicial review in Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) matters was not respected. This paper is focused on two reasons for the incompatibility: Protocol No 16 to the ECHR and Common foreign and security policy issues and it will try to answer further question : if the EU would access the ECHR, will the human rights protection be potentially better. Finally, the paper will reach the conclusion about two analysed reasons of incompatibility and propose possible solutions if there are some.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Pravo



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Osijek

Profili:

Avatar Url Tunjica Petrašević (autor)

Avatar Url Dunja Duić (autor)


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Petrašević, Tunjica; Duić, Dunja
Opinion 2/13 on the EU accession to the ECHR // New Developments in the EU Labour, Equality and Human Rights Law / Mario Vinković (ur.).
Osijek: J J Strossmayer University of Osijek Faculty of Law, 2015. str. 251-267 (pozvano predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), ostalo)
Petrašević, T. & Duić, D. (2015) Opinion 2/13 on the EU accession to the ECHR. U: Mario Vinković (ur.)New Developments in the EU Labour, Equality and Human Rights Law.
@article{article, author = {Petra\v{s}evi\'{c}, Tunjica and Dui\'{c}, Dunja}, year = {2015}, pages = {251-267}, keywords = {European Convention on Human Rights, EU accession to ECHR, Opinion 2/13, Court of Justice, Protocol No 16, CFSP}, isbn = {978-953-8109-03-4}, title = {Opinion 2/13 on the EU accession to the ECHR}, keyword = {European Convention on Human Rights, EU accession to ECHR, Opinion 2/13, Court of Justice, Protocol No 16, CFSP}, publisher = {J J Strossmayer University of Osijek Faculty of Law}, publisherplace = {Osijek, Hrvatska} }
@article{article, author = {Petra\v{s}evi\'{c}, Tunjica and Dui\'{c}, Dunja}, year = {2015}, pages = {251-267}, keywords = {European Convention on Human Rights, EU accession to ECHR, Opinion 2/13, Court of Justice, Protocol No 16, CFSP}, isbn = {978-953-8109-03-4}, title = {Opinion 2/13 on the EU accession to the ECHR}, keyword = {European Convention on Human Rights, EU accession to ECHR, Opinion 2/13, Court of Justice, Protocol No 16, CFSP}, publisher = {J J Strossmayer University of Osijek Faculty of Law}, publisherplace = {Osijek, Hrvatska} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font