Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 824695

Social capital and educational achievements: Coleman vs. Bourdieu


Rogošić, Silvia; Baranović, Branislava
Social capital and educational achievements: Coleman vs. Bourdieu // CEPS journal, 6 (2016), 2; 81-100 (podatak o recenziji nije dostupan, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 824695 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Social capital and educational achievements: Coleman vs. Bourdieu

Autori
Rogošić, Silvia ; Baranović, Branislava

Izvornik
CEPS journal (1855-9719) 6 (2016), 2; 81-100

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Coleman ; Bourdieu ; social capital ; educational achievements ; theory of social reproduction ; theory of social mobility

Sažetak
The influence of social capital on an individual’s educational achievements is the subject of numerous scientific papers. Research on social capital is most frequently based on Coleman’s (1988) or Bourdieu’s (1986) theories of capital, which are related to different paradigms of social theory: whereas Coleman’s approach has its roots in structural functionalism, Bourdieu’s approach contains elements of conflict theory. A number of authors, starting with Bourdieu, attempt to explain and prove that, when connected with the education of individuals, the activity of social capital facilitates social reproduction. Other authors support the notion that social capital is, in fact, a powerful weapon that encourages social mobility. A third group of researchers emphasise that neither of these approaches in isolation can entirety explain the influences of social capital on an individual’s education (Ho, 2003). The present paper offers a review of research focusing on the influences of social capital on educational achievements, while outlining the fundamental differences between the two theoretical approaches that are most frequently used for research of this topic. The aim of the paper is to explain the influence of social capital on an individual’s educational achievements under Bourdieu’s and Coleman’s theoretical concepts, and to establish whether combining the approaches is possible. The conclusion and arguments show that it is legitimate to use all three theoretical approaches

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Sociologija



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Institut za društvena istraživanja , Zagreb,
Učiteljski fakultet, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Branislava Baranović (autor)

Avatar Url Silvia Rogošić (autor)

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Rogošić, Silvia; Baranović, Branislava
Social capital and educational achievements: Coleman vs. Bourdieu // CEPS journal, 6 (2016), 2; 81-100 (podatak o recenziji nije dostupan, članak, znanstveni)
Rogošić, S. & Baranović, B. (2016) Social capital and educational achievements: Coleman vs. Bourdieu. CEPS journal, 6 (2), 81-100.
@article{article, author = {Rogo\v{s}i\'{c}, Silvia and Baranovi\'{c}, Branislava}, year = {2016}, pages = {81-100}, keywords = {Coleman, Bourdieu, social capital, educational achievements, theory of social reproduction, theory of social mobility}, journal = {CEPS journal}, volume = {6}, number = {2}, issn = {1855-9719}, title = {Social capital and educational achievements: Coleman vs. Bourdieu}, keyword = {Coleman, Bourdieu, social capital, educational achievements, theory of social reproduction, theory of social mobility} }
@article{article, author = {Rogo\v{s}i\'{c}, Silvia and Baranovi\'{c}, Branislava}, year = {2016}, pages = {81-100}, keywords = {Coleman, Bourdieu, social capital, educational achievements, theory of social reproduction, theory of social mobility}, journal = {CEPS journal}, volume = {6}, number = {2}, issn = {1855-9719}, title = {Social capital and educational achievements: Coleman vs. Bourdieu}, keyword = {Coleman, Bourdieu, social capital, educational achievements, theory of social reproduction, theory of social mobility} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font