Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 816216

Hysteric vs. Knowledge on Film


Milanko, Andrea
Hysteric vs. Knowledge on Film // Psychoanalysis in Our Time 2015 – Psychoanalysis and Science
Talin, Estonija, 2015. (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, neobjavljeni rad, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 816216 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Hysteric vs. Knowledge on Film

Autori
Milanko, Andrea

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, neobjavljeni rad, znanstveni

Skup
Psychoanalysis in Our Time 2015 – Psychoanalysis and Science

Mjesto i datum
Talin, Estonija, 13.03.2015. - 15.03.2015

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
hysteric; transference; knowledge; Lars von Trier; psychoanalysis

Sažetak
In his Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920), Freud appealed to philosophy and biology hoping they would provide answers to his questions. His faith in natural sciences was steadfast, which is all the more suprising since only when Freud, the neurologist, had made way for Freud, the psychoanalyst, did psychoanalysis come to existence ; he abandoned medicine in favour of listening. Indeed, it was one of his hysteric patients, Anna O., that labelled the remedy for her infliction using parlance closer to arts than sciences – talking cure. Future of psychoanalysis is inseparabe from the future of humanities, as Foucault stated in his essay What is an author? (1969), alluding to Althusser and Lacan: “A study of Galileo’s works could alter our knowledge of the history, but not the science, of mechanics ; whereas a re-examination of the books by Freud or Marx can transforn our understanding of psychoanalysis or Marxism.“ From Lacan’s point of view, science and university are similar to paranoiac in that they are driven by a relentless pursuit of truth and knowledge with a strong belief the latter is attainable, it is “out there“, much like the Prefect of the police from Lacan’s Seminar Book II. I argue that in Lars von Trier’s Nymphomaniac Vol. 1 and Vol. 2, a film with a plot bearing resemblance to psychoanalytic treatment, Joe and Seligman embody hysteric and scientific stance towards knowledge respectively, i.e. that the film stages truth as intersubjective. Seligman tries to produce a schism in Joe between her past and present self, much like a psychoanalyst, and he compares Joe’s self-narrative with examples from arts and sciences. Joe is a hysteric who challenges his encyclopeadic knowledge, opposes his understanding of her past transgressions and exposes to ridicule his vain attempts at interpretation…

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Filologija



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Andrea Milanko (autor)

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Milanko, Andrea
Hysteric vs. Knowledge on Film // Psychoanalysis in Our Time 2015 – Psychoanalysis and Science
Talin, Estonija, 2015. (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, neobjavljeni rad, znanstveni)
Milanko, A. (2015) Hysteric vs. Knowledge on Film. U: Psychoanalysis in Our Time 2015 – Psychoanalysis and Science.
@article{article, author = {Milanko, Andrea}, year = {2015}, keywords = {hysteric, transference, knowledge, Lars von Trier, psychoanalysis}, title = {Hysteric vs. Knowledge on Film}, keyword = {hysteric, transference, knowledge, Lars von Trier, psychoanalysis}, publisherplace = {Talin, Estonija} }
@article{article, author = {Milanko, Andrea}, year = {2015}, keywords = {hysteric, transference, knowledge, Lars von Trier, psychoanalysis}, title = {Hysteric vs. Knowledge on Film}, keyword = {hysteric, transference, knowledge, Lars von Trier, psychoanalysis}, publisherplace = {Talin, Estonija} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font