Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 816081
Private and Public Dimensions of Personal Data in Online Speech: Lessons from the Right to be Forgotten
Private and Public Dimensions of Personal Data in Online Speech: Lessons from the Right to be Forgotten // CEE eDem and eGov Days 2016 - Multi-Level (e)Governance: Is ICT a means to enhance transparency and democracy? Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2016 / Balthasar, Alexander ; Golob, Blaž ; Hansen, Hendrik ; Müller-Török, Robert ; Nemeslaki, András ; Pichler, Johannes ; Prosser, Alexander (ur.).
Beč: Oesterreichische Computer Gesellschaft, 2016. str. 451-462 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 816081 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Private and Public Dimensions of Personal Data in Online Speech: Lessons from the Right to be Forgotten
Autori
Miloš, Matija
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
CEE eDem and eGov Days 2016 - Multi-Level (e)Governance: Is ICT a means to enhance transparency and democracy? Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2016
/ Balthasar, Alexander ; Golob, Blaž ; Hansen, Hendrik ; Müller-Török, Robert ; Nemeslaki, András ; Pichler, Johannes ; Prosser, Alexander - Beč : Oesterreichische Computer Gesellschaft, 2016, 451-462
ISBN
978-3-903035-11-9
Skup
CEE eDem and eGov Days 2016 - Multi-Level (e)Governance: Is ICT a means to enhance transparency and democracy?
Mjesto i datum
Budimpešta, Mađarska, 12.05.2016. - 13.05.2016
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
data protection; freedom of expression; privacy; internet; constitutional law
Sažetak
This paper provides an analysis of Spanish case law involving the right to be forgotten. Its purpose is to examine whether the courts are creating rules that may serve as guidelines in protecting free expression online. The features of the analysed case law show that facilitating speech on the internet should not rely on uncritical reception of legal categories applicable to expression in other fora. Instead, I argue that safeguarding freedom of expression online should pay more heed to the multiplicity of the publics and the fluidity of their interest. If the right to be forgotten is to be more broadly applied to speech as the right to erasure provided under the new Data Protection Regulation, safeguarding the internet’s potential for facilitating democracy and human rights will require a far more extensive effort at balancing conflicting interests instead of prioritising one good, data protection, over speech.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo