Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 811917

Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys


Pupovac, Vanja; Fanelli, Daniele
Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys // Science and engineering ethics, 21 (2015), 5; 1331-1352 doi:10.1007%2Fs11948-014-9600-6 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 811917 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys

Autori
Pupovac, Vanja ; Fanelli, Daniele

Izvornik
Science and engineering ethics (1353-3452) 21 (2015), 5; 1331-1352

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Plagiarism ; Research misconduct ; Research integrity ; Data fabrication ; Data falsification ; Survey methodology

Sažetak
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of anonymous surveys asking scientists whether they ever committed various forms of plagiarism. From May to December 2011 we searched 35 bibliographic databases, five grey literature databases and hand searched nine journals for potentially relevant studies. We included surveys that asked scientists if, in a given recall period, they had committed or knew of a colleague who committed plagiarism, and from each survey extracted the proportion of those who reported at least one case. Studies that focused on academic (i.e. student) plagiarism were excluded. Literature searches returned 12, 460 titles from which 17 relevant survey studies were identified. Meta-analysis of studies reporting committed (N = 7) and witnessed (N = 11) plagiarism yielded a pooled estimate of, respectively, 1.7 % (95 % CI 1.2–2.4) and 30 % (95 % CI 17–46). Basic methodological factors, including sample size, year of survey, delivery method and whether survey questions were explicit rather than indirect made a significant difference on survey results. Even after controlling for these methodological factors, between-study differences in admission rates were significantly above those expected by sampling error alone and remained largely unexplained. Despite several limitations of the data and of this meta-analysis, we draw three robust conclusions: (1) The rate at which scientists report knowing a colleague who committed plagiarism is higher than for data fabrication and falsification ; (2) The rate at which scientists report knowing a colleague who committed plagiarism is correlated to that of fabrication and falsification ; (3) The rate at which scientists admit having committed either form of misconduct (i.e. fabrication, falsification and plagiarism) in surveys has declined over time.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita

Napomena
Dodatni materijali besplatno su dostupni na gore navednim mrežnim stranicama rada.



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka

Profili:

Avatar Url Vanja Pupovac (autor)

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Pupovac, Vanja; Fanelli, Daniele
Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys // Science and engineering ethics, 21 (2015), 5; 1331-1352 doi:10.1007%2Fs11948-014-9600-6 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Pupovac, V. & Fanelli, D. (2015) Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys. Science and engineering ethics, 21 (5), 1331-1352 doi:10.1007%2Fs11948-014-9600-6.
@article{article, author = {Pupovac, Vanja and Fanelli, Daniele}, year = {2015}, pages = {1331-1352}, DOI = {10.1007\%2Fs11948-014-9600-6}, keywords = {Plagiarism, Research misconduct, Research integrity, Data fabrication, Data falsification, Survey methodology}, journal = {Science and engineering ethics}, doi = {10.1007\%2Fs11948-014-9600-6}, volume = {21}, number = {5}, issn = {1353-3452}, title = {Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys}, keyword = {Plagiarism, Research misconduct, Research integrity, Data fabrication, Data falsification, Survey methodology} }
@article{article, author = {Pupovac, Vanja and Fanelli, Daniele}, year = {2015}, pages = {1331-1352}, DOI = {10.1007\%2Fs11948-014-9600-6}, keywords = {Plagiarism, Research misconduct, Research integrity, Data fabrication, Data falsification, Survey methodology}, journal = {Science and engineering ethics}, doi = {10.1007\%2Fs11948-014-9600-6}, volume = {21}, number = {5}, issn = {1353-3452}, title = {Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys}, keyword = {Plagiarism, Research misconduct, Research integrity, Data fabrication, Data falsification, Survey methodology} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka::


  • EMBASE (Excerpta Medica)
  • FSTA: Food Science and Technology Abstracts
  • MEDLINE
  • Philosopher's Index
  • Science Citation Index
  • Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch)
  • Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition
  • SCOPUS
  • EBSCO
  • CSA
  • Academic OneFile
  • Academic Search


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font