Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 811895

Information technology in research methodology: improvement or maybe not?


Mavrinac, Martina; Brumini, Gordana; Petrovečki, Mladen
Information technology in research methodology: improvement or maybe not? // Studies in Health Technology and Informatics / Cornet, R. ; Stoicu-Tivadar, L. ; Hoerbst, A. ; Calderon, CLP ; Andersen, SK ; Hercigonja-Szekeres, M. (ur.).
Madrid, Španjolska: IOS, 2015. str. 996-997 doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-512-8-996 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 811895 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Information technology in research methodology: improvement or maybe not?

Autori
Mavrinac, Martina ; Brumini, Gordana ; Petrovečki, Mladen

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni

Izvornik
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics / Cornet, R. ; Stoicu-Tivadar, L. ; Hoerbst, A. ; Calderon, CLP ; Andersen, SK ; Hercigonja-Szekeres, M. - : IOS, 2015, 996-997

Skup
European Medical Informatics Conference

Mjesto i datum
Madrid, Španjolska, 28.05.2015. - 31.05.2015

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
Data Collection ; Medical Informatics ; Attitude ; Plagiarism ; Questionnaires

Sažetak
Introduction. With the development of information technology, the collection of data has changed and during the years we have used different methods of survey collecting data: classical and online. The aim of this study was to compare different methods of data collection checking their advantages and disadvantages. Methods. We have been investigating the attitude toward plagiarism among university students and biomedical researchers. Attitude Towards Plagiarism Questionnaire (ATPQ) was used to measure students' (2009) and researchers' (2010 and 2013) attitudes with two different methods. The first method was classical directly paper-and- pencil method of collecting data used in 2009 (N=239). The second method was online data collection used in 2010 (N=295) and 2013 (N=177). We used the web-service SurveyMonkeyTM (SurveyMonkey, Palo Alto, California) to make our questionnaire easily accessible on-line for all the participants. Participants get an e-mail with an invitation to participate in the research. Every two weeks after the first invitation we send a reminder to fulfill the questionnaire. Results. Collecting data time was three months for every method of collection. Paper and pencil method required more organization and three interviewers in different places, and every survey took up to one hour with a high cost for questionnaire printing and interviewers payments. Response rate was 99% (N=238). We manually carried collected data into an MS Excel table, which requires four days of work and two researchers (because of the check). Online data collection required one researcher and one hour to send all the surveys. The collection data period was longer (up to two weeks), and because of the low response rates we had to repeat the survey three to four times. At all, the response rate was 38% (N=295) in 2010 and 29% (N=177) in 2013. Collected data were ready for statistical analysis. Discussion. Information technology has improved research methodology quality. We have reduced collecting data time and organizational efforts using online data collection services. However, response rate remains the main disadvantage of Internet data collection.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka,
Fakultet zdravstvenih studija u Rijeci

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi ebooks.iospress.nl

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Mavrinac, Martina; Brumini, Gordana; Petrovečki, Mladen
Information technology in research methodology: improvement or maybe not? // Studies in Health Technology and Informatics / Cornet, R. ; Stoicu-Tivadar, L. ; Hoerbst, A. ; Calderon, CLP ; Andersen, SK ; Hercigonja-Szekeres, M. (ur.).
Madrid, Španjolska: IOS, 2015. str. 996-997 doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-512-8-996 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
Mavrinac, M., Brumini, G. & Petrovečki, M. (2015) Information technology in research methodology: improvement or maybe not?. U: Cornet, R., Stoicu-Tivadar, L., Hoerbst, A., Calderon, C., Andersen, S. & Hercigonja-Szekeres, M. (ur.)Studies in Health Technology and Informatics doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-512-8-996.
@article{article, author = {Mavrinac, Martina and Brumini, Gordana and Petrove\v{c}ki, Mladen}, year = {2015}, pages = {996-997}, DOI = {10.3233/978-1-61499-512-8-996}, keywords = {Data Collection, Medical Informatics, Attitude, Plagiarism, Questionnaires}, doi = {10.3233/978-1-61499-512-8-996}, title = {Information technology in research methodology: improvement or maybe not?}, keyword = {Data Collection, Medical Informatics, Attitude, Plagiarism, Questionnaires}, publisher = {IOS}, publisherplace = {Madrid, \v{S}panjolska} }
@article{article, author = {Mavrinac, Martina and Brumini, Gordana and Petrove\v{c}ki, Mladen}, year = {2015}, pages = {996-997}, DOI = {10.3233/978-1-61499-512-8-996}, keywords = {Data Collection, Medical Informatics, Attitude, Plagiarism, Questionnaires}, doi = {10.3233/978-1-61499-512-8-996}, title = {Information technology in research methodology: improvement or maybe not?}, keyword = {Data Collection, Medical Informatics, Attitude, Plagiarism, Questionnaires}, publisher = {IOS}, publisherplace = {Madrid, \v{S}panjolska} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font