Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 809696
The effect of foreground mitigation strategy on EoR window recovery
The effect of foreground mitigation strategy on EoR window recovery // Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 458 (2016), 3; 2928-2939 doi:10.1093/mnras/stw161 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 809696 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
The effect of foreground mitigation strategy on EoR window recovery
Autori
Chapman, Emma ; Zaroubi, Saleem ; Abdalla, Filipe B. ; Dulwich, Fred ; Jelić, Vibor ; Mort, Benjamin
Izvornik
Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (0035-8711) 458
(2016), 3;
2928-2939
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
methods: statistical; cosmology: theory; dark ages; reionization; first stars; diffuse radiation
Sažetak
The removal of the Galactic and extragalactic foregrounds remains a major challenge for those wishing to make a detection of the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) 21 cm signal. Multiple methods of modelling these foregrounds with varying levels of assumption have been trialled and shown promising recoveries on simulated data. Recently however there has been increased discussion of using the expected shape of the foregrounds in Fourier space to define an EoR window free of foreground contamination. By carrying out analysis within this window only, one can avoid the foregrounds and any statistical bias they might introduce by instead removing these foregrounds. In this paper, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both foreground removal and foreground avoidance. We create a series of simulations with noise levels in line with both current and future experiments and compare the recovered statistical cosmological signal from foreground avoidance and a simplified, frequency independent foreground removal model. We find that for current generation experiments, while foreground avoidance enables a better recovery at kperp > 0.6 Mpc-1, foreground removal is able to recover significantly more signal at small klos for both current and future experiments. We also relax the assumption that the foregrounds are smooth. For line-of-sight variations only, foreground removal is able to make a good signal recovery even at 1 per cent while foreground avoidance is compromised significantly. We find that both methods perform well for foreground models with line-of-sight and spatial variations around 0.1 per cent however at levels larger than this both methods are compromised.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Fizika
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus