Naslov
Politicum praxisa: filozofija u ogledalu vlasti
(The poliical of Praxis: Philosophy in the Mirror of Power)

Autori
Mikulić, Borislav

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Poglavlja u knjigama, znanstveni

Knjiga
Aspekti praxisa. Refleksije uz 50. obljetnicu

Urednik/ci
Mikulić, Borislav ; Žitko, Mislav

Izdavač
Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu

Grad
Zagreb

Godina
2015

Raspon stranica
74-111

ISBN
978-953-175-580-1

Ključne riječi
praxis filozofija, časopis Praxis 1964-1974, Praxis International 1981-1994, socijalizam i disidencija, kritika otuđenja, antibirokratska revolucija, beogradski praxis, filozofija i nacionalizam
(praxis philosophy, the journal Praxis 1964-1974, Praxis International 1981-1993, socialism and dissidents, critique of alienation, anti-burocratic revolution, the Belgrade praxis group, philosophy and nationalism)

Sažetak
Članak ocrtava različite aspekte 'političkog' na časopisu, grupi i intelektualnom strujanju u bivšoj Jugoslaviji poznatim pod imenom 'praxis' od početaka djelovanja 60ih godina i osobito kraja ranih 90ih. U prvom dijelu tematizira se novo značenje pojma 'prakse' koje djelomice obuhvaća i samu grupu a koje je grupacija praxis afirmirala početkom 60-ih godina kroz usvajanje i reinterpretaciju filozofije mladog Marxa i marksističke filozofije 20. stoljeća. U drugom dijelu prikazuje se bliska, ali uglavnom nepriznata paralela između načelnog kritičkog gledišta praxisa o disciplinarnoj podjeli same filozofije s pragmatističkom kritikom teorije spoznaje kod R. Rortya. Njegova identifikacija moderne filozo¬fije od Hobbesa do Kanta kao “tribunala uma” i “nadglednice legitimnosti” ispituje se, u trećem dijelu, kroz primjenu takvog modela političnosti filozofije na samu grupaciju praxis. Na pretpostavci o postojanju zajedničkog općeg teorijskog i svjetonazorskog ishodišta grupacije praxis iz glavnog razdoblja djelovanja 1964-1974., ustanovljavaju se bitni momenti postupnog udaljavanja u shvaćanju političnosti između najistaknutijih članova zagrebačke i beogradske grupe kroz različite faze djelovanja (prije i poslije zabrane časopisa Praxis 1974., uključu¬jući i razdoblje časopisa Praxis International 1981-1994.). U četvrtom dijelu izlaže se shvaćanje da se politička diferencijacija između vodećih članova dviju grupacija odvija s jedne strane kroz još uvijek zajedničku odanost praksisovaca načelu društvene- kritičke funkcije filozofije koja je, napose u Beogradu kasnih 70ih i ranih 80ih, poprimila tipične oblike disidentske borbe za ljudska prava iz toga vremena. S druge strane, kasniji angažman vodećih beogradskih praxisovaca za srpski politički maspok s kraja 80-ih i početka 90ih prikazuje se kao pragmatički motiviran, gonjen željom za političkom moći, zaokret poput Heideggerovog, unutar disidentskog modela borbe prema apologiji 'nacionalnog'. U odnosu na izvornu kritičku investiciju iz kasnih 60ih-70ih godina taj zaokret je konceptualno proizvoljan i pseudofilozofski, oslonjen na nacionalističko-ideološko prezaposjedanje pojma 'autentičnosti'.

Izvorni jezik
Hrvatski

Znanstvena područja
Filozofija

Napomena
English Summary: The 'political' of Praxis: Philosophy in the Mirror of Power The article outlines different aspects of 'the political' as they emerge from the work of philosophical group Praxis, its journal, and its ambiguous intellectual role in the former Yugoslavia from the mid- 1960s to the mid-1990s. The first part of the article addresses a new meaning of the notion of 'practice'—in contrast to the traditional understanding of practice as opposed to theory— which refers partly to the Praxis group itself due to their re-interpretation of and inscription in both young Marx's and the early 20th century Western Marxist philosophies (such as G. Lucács', E. Bloch's, and H. Marcuse's). In the second part, a closer parallel is drawn between, on one side, the critical stance of several leading Praxis philosophers towards general disciplinary divisions in philosophy, and on the other, Richard Rorty's pragmatic critique of theory of knowledge. On this basis, Rorty's identification of modern philosophy from Hobbes to Kant with a supreme “tribunal of Reason”, allied with civil power against the ecclesiastic one, is re-examined and applied to the Praxis group itself and its relation to political power in socialist Yugoslavia. Assuming that all members of Praxis group shared a common position and worldview during the main period of their activity (from 1964 to 1974), the article points to important moments of a slow and continuous differentiation between Zagreb- and Belgrade-based groups, tied to the inherent political character of their respective theories. It is suggested that these moments can be found before and after 1975 when both the journal Praxis, in its national and international editions, and the Korčula Summer School were denied financial support by Croatian authorities. This political development includes a period of a radical split between Zagreb and Belgrade groups over the controversy around journal Praxis International, published in Oxford between 1981 and 1994. The process of differentiation is described, in the fourth part of the article, as a result of an enduring commitment of the Praxis philosophers to the ideal of a social-critical function of philosophy, which then, especially in Belgrade between 1975 and 1985, assumed forms typical of the dissident movements, active in Eastern European states at that time. On this background, the late 1980s and early 1990s participation of several leading members of the Belgrade group in the Serbian nationalist mass-movement is revealed as a pragmatically motivated, Heidegger-like 'turn', driven by desire for political power, within their late 70s and early 80s dissident battle for civil rights towards the 'national'. It is argued that this shift required a falsified revisionist autobiography, quite typical of ex-Yugoslav intellectuals in this period. Compared to their original theoretical investment from the early 60s onward, this later development appears conceptually contingent and pseudo- philosophical, based only on a nationalistic-ideological re- possession of the rather vacuous notion of 'authenticity'.

POVEZANOST RADA