Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 775002
Interactive effects of supervisory and peer justice climates on supervisory and peer- oriented outcomes
Interactive effects of supervisory and peer justice climates on supervisory and peer- oriented outcomes // 17th congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology: "Respectful and effective leadership - managing people and organizations in turbulent times."
Oslo, Norveška, 2015. str. - (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 775002 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Interactive effects of supervisory and peer justice climates on supervisory and peer- oriented outcomes
Autori
Jakopec, Ana ; Sušanj, Zoran ; Molina, Agustin
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
17th congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology: "Respectful and effective leadership - managing people and organizations in turbulent times."
/ - , 2015
Skup
17th congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology: "Respectful and effective leadership - managing people and organizations in turbulent times."
Mjesto i datum
Oslo, Norveška, 20.05.2015. - 23.05.2015
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
supervisory justice climate ; peer justice climate ; interactive effects ; supervisory and peer oriented group-level outcomes
Sažetak
This study aimed to examine the interactive effects of supervisory and peer justice climates on supervisory and peer-oriented outcomes. We analyzed the data collected from 121 work teams by using polynomial regression combined with response surface methodology. The results confirmed the growing prominence of peer justice, showing its importance in predicting both peer and supervisory-oriented outcomes. All outcomes improved as the level of supervisory and peer justice climates increased. Both peer-oriented outcomes (organizational citizenship behavior towards peers and cohesiveness) depended upon the level of perceived peer justice, regardless of the level of supervisory justice climate. Similarly, the teams' trust in the supervisor depended upon the level of perceived supervisory justice climate, regardless of the level of peer justice. To the contrary, organizational citizenship behavior towards the supervisor depended on the degree of the misalignment between justice climates. Specifically, when at least one source of justice —either supervisor or peers—was perceived as fair, organizational citizenship behavior towards the supervisor was at its highest level, even when the other source was simultaneously perceived as unfair. The cross- sectional design of this study does not allow to infer causality. This study further deepens our understanding of the target similarity model while questioning the applicability of congruence theory to understanding the effects of misalignment of supervisory and peer justice climate. Overall, this study provides, through the lens of polynomial regression and response surface methodology, theoretically-driven information that highlights the role of peer justice as a key contextual phenomena for understanding teams’ attitudes and behaviors.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Psihologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Rijeka,
Filozofski fakultet, Osijek