Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 770150
What is probability and what is then statistical mechanics?
What is probability and what is then statistical mechanics? // Physics & Philosophy, The Fourth Conference, Time, Space and Space-Time, Book of Abstracts, Split, 6–7 July 2015 / Gabriela Bašić, Luka Boršić, Ljudevit Hanžek, Dragan Poljak, Franjo Sokolić, Ivana Skuhala Karasman, Berislav Žarnić (ur.).
Split, 2015. str. 6-6 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 770150 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
What is probability and what is then statistical mechanics?
Autori
Kuić, Domagoj
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
Physics & Philosophy, The Fourth Conference, Time, Space and Space-Time, Book of Abstracts, Split, 6–7 July 2015
/ Gabriela Bašić, Luka Boršić, Ljudevit Hanžek, Dragan Poljak, Franjo Sokolić, Ivana Skuhala Karasman, Berislav Žarnić - Split, 2015, 6-6
Skup
The Fourth PHYSICS & PHILOSOPHY Conference "Time, Space and Space-Time", University of Split - Croatia, 6--7 July 2015
Mjesto i datum
Split, Hrvatska, 06.07.2015. - 07.07.2015
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
probability; frequency interpretation; statistical mechanics; Gibbs formalism; maximum information entropy principle
Sažetak
From the point of view of predictive statistical mechanics, with the exception of quantum mechanical probabilities, there is no reason to consider any probability distribution as the only correct distribution. Such a view is in a marked contrast to the interpretation that defines probabilites only in terms of frequencies as the objective property of the observed system. In the frequentist interpretation the probabilities are experimentaly verifiable, and consequently, the foundational problem of statistical mechanics would be to derive them and to justify them in the sense of frequencies. Jaynes presented the opposite view, that if we the choose to represent the degree of our knowledge about the individual system, then there can not be anything physically real in the frequencies of the ensemble of a large number of systems, nor there is any sense in asking which ensemble is the only correct one. What we call different ensembles in reality corresponds to the different degrees of knowledge about the individual system, or about certain physical situation. In the argumentation of this viewpoint, Jaynes referred to the statement by Gibbs, according to which the ensembles are chosen to illustrate the probabilites of events in the real word. The simplest interpretation of Gibbs formalism follows from the fact that by maximizing the information entropy, which is also known as uncertainty, subject to given constraints, one predicts just the macroscopic behaviour that can happen in the greatest number of ways compatible with those constraints. Without going deeper into the problem of interpretation of probabilites, which is even more pronounced in the case of non-equilibrium states, it is important that the distributions that follow from the application of the principle of maximum information entropy depend only on the available information. If one referres only to predictions, from the same viewpoint one can speak about the objectivity only in the extent in which the incompleteness of information is taken into account. Consistent with this way of thinking, by applying the principle of maximum information entropy, we come to the relevant statistical distributions.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Fizika