Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 761757
The controversy about condicere in D. 12, 1, 4, 1
The controversy about condicere in D. 12, 1, 4, 1 // XV. Internationales Sommerseminar zur antiken Rechtsgeschichte: Leges damnatae – exegetische Übungen in der antiken Rechtsgeschichte
Szeged, Mađarska, 2011. (predavanje, nije recenziran, neobjavljeni rad, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 761757 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
The controversy about condicere in D. 12, 1, 4, 1
Autori
Karlović, Tomislav ; Held, Henrik-Riko
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, neobjavljeni rad, znanstveni
Skup
XV. Internationales Sommerseminar zur antiken Rechtsgeschichte: Leges damnatae – exegetische Übungen in der antiken Rechtsgeschichte
Mjesto i datum
Szeged, Mađarska, 23.05.2011. - 25.05.2011
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Nije recenziran
Ključne riječi
condicere; pignus; fiducia; condictio furtiva; Roman law
Sažetak
The fragment D. 12, 1, 4, 1 (Ulpianus 34 ad Sab.) is controversial regarding its treatment of pignus, as it has originally most likely dealt with fiducia, and the possible use of condictio in its context. Analysis of the concept and the use of condictio in classical law shows that the only one that could have been used there was condictio furtiva. This fragment does not provide circumstances which could warrant its use, which reinforces the interpolation theories.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Zagreb
