Naslov
Insulin analogues (insulin detemir and insulin aspart) versus traditional human insulins (NPH insulin and regular human insulin) in basal-bolus therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes.

Autori
Hermansen, K. ; Fontaine, P. ; Kukolja, Karmen ; Peterkova, V. ; Leth, G. ; Gall, M.-A.

Izvornik
Diabetologia (Berlin) (0012-186X) 47 (2004), 4; 622-629

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Glycaemic control · Hypoglycaemia · Insulin analogues · Insulin aspart · Insulin detemir · Type 1 diabetes mellitus · Variability

Sažetak
Aims/hypothesis. The aim of the trial was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of two types of basal-bolus therapy, using either the soluble long-acting basal insulin analogue, insulin detemir, in combination with the rapid-acting analogue, insulin aspart, or NPH insulin in combination with mealtime regular human insulin. Methods. In this 18-week, 1:1 randomised, open-labelled, parallel trial, 595 patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus received insulin detemir or NPH insulin in the morning and at bedtime in combination with mealtime insulin aspart or regular human insulin respectively. Results. Glycaemic control with insulin detemir/insulin aspart was improved in comparison with NPH insulin/regular human insulin (HbA1c: 7.88% vs 8.11% ; mean difference: -0.22% point [95% CI: -0.34 to -0.10] ; p< ; 0.001). Self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles differed between the groups (p< ; 0.001), with lower postprandial plasma glucose levels in the insulin detemir/insulin aspart group. Within-person day-to-day variation in plasma glucose was lower with insulin detemir/insulin aspart than with NPH insulin/regular human insulin (SD: 2.88 vs 3.12 mmol/l ; p< ; 0.001). Risk of overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia (23.00-06.00 hours) was, respectively, 21% (p=0.036) and 55% (p< ; 0.001) lower in the insulin detemir/insulin aspart group than in the NPH insulin/regular human insulin group. Body weight (adjusted for baseline and change in HbA1C) was 1 kg lower with insulin detemir/insulin aspart than with NPH insulin/regular human insulin (p< ; 0.001). Conclusions/interpretation. Basal-bolus therapy using insulin detemir/insulin aspart offers a better balance of control and tolerability than with NPH insulin/regular human insulin. The low variability and more physiological action profiles generated with these insulin analogues resulted in improved glycaemic control with lower risk of hypoglycaemia and no concomitant body weight increase.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti

POVEZANOST RADA