Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 748795

Can There Be an Artifact Theory of Law?


Burazin, Luka
Can There Be an Artifact Theory of Law? // Ratio Juris, 29 (2016), 3; 385-401 doi:10.1111/raju.12134 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 748795 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Can There Be an Artifact Theory of Law?

Autori
Burazin, Luka

Izvornik
Ratio Juris (0952-1917) 29 (2016), 3; 385-401

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
artifacts ; institutional ontology ; legal system ; legal theory ; artifact theory of law

Sažetak
The paper aims at attempting an inquiry into what the claim that 'law' by its nature or character is an artifact, in fact, would entail and what, in the end, an artifact theory of law might look like. Before embarking on such an inquiry, I will, however, first try to indicate at least some potential payoffs of the artifactual understanding of law (Section 2). In order to be able to answer certain ontological questions concerning legal systems as artifact kinds, I will outline in what follows a general theory of artifacts (Section 3). I will do this by exploring several theories of artifacts developed in general philosophy, drawing mostly on those of R. Hilpinen, A. L. Thomasson, L. R. Baker and P. Bloom, since their theories present themselves as general theories of artifacts, capable of being applied to any artifact kind. Furthermore, since I take legal systems to be institutional in character, and thus different from 'ordinary' artifacts, I will introduce certain elements of social (institutional) ontology and set the ontological grounds for 'institutional artifacts' as a distinct artifact type (Section 4). This will form the basis of a rough sketch of what an artifact theory of law might look like and what the challenges for such a theory might be (Section 5).

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Pravo



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Luka Burazin (autor)

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Burazin, Luka
Can There Be an Artifact Theory of Law? // Ratio Juris, 29 (2016), 3; 385-401 doi:10.1111/raju.12134 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Burazin, L. (2016) Can There Be an Artifact Theory of Law?. Ratio Juris, 29 (3), 385-401 doi:10.1111/raju.12134.
@article{article, author = {Burazin, Luka}, year = {2016}, pages = {385-401}, DOI = {10.1111/raju.12134}, keywords = {artifacts, institutional ontology, legal system, legal theory, artifact theory of law}, journal = {Ratio Juris}, doi = {10.1111/raju.12134}, volume = {29}, number = {3}, issn = {0952-1917}, title = {Can There Be an Artifact Theory of Law?}, keyword = {artifacts, institutional ontology, legal system, legal theory, artifact theory of law} }
@article{article, author = {Burazin, Luka}, year = {2016}, pages = {385-401}, DOI = {10.1111/raju.12134}, keywords = {artifacts, institutional ontology, legal system, legal theory, artifact theory of law}, journal = {Ratio Juris}, doi = {10.1111/raju.12134}, volume = {29}, number = {3}, issn = {0952-1917}, title = {Can There Be an Artifact Theory of Law?}, keyword = {artifacts, institutional ontology, legal system, legal theory, artifact theory of law} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Scopus
  • HeinOnline


Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka::


  • Index to Legal Periodicals & Books (EBSCO Publishing), Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest)


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font