Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 740566
Coetzee Meets Foucault: Power, Punishment and Political Violence in Wating for the Barbarians and Disgrace
Coetzee Meets Foucault: Power, Punishment and Political Violence in Wating for the Barbarians and Disgrace // Violence, Art, and Politics
Zagreb, Hrvatska, 2014. (predavanje, domaća recenzija, neobjavljeni rad, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 740566 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Coetzee Meets Foucault: Power, Punishment and
Political Violence in Wating for the Barbarians
and Disgrace
Autori
Petković, Krešimir
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, neobjavljeni rad, znanstveni
Skup
Violence, Art, and Politics
Mjesto i datum
Zagreb, Hrvatska, 24.05.2014
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Domaća recenzija
Ključne riječi
Foucault ; Coetzee ; power ; punishment ; violence ; subject ; Waiting for the Barbarians ; Disgrace
Sažetak
Can we really learn something about power and violence by reading two prize winning pieces of fiction, written by a Nobel laureate in literature, through the lenses of the late and controversial Collège de France Professor? In this paper I argue that we can. I first present a short reading of Waiting for the Barbarians, a dystopian story of a middle aged magistrate who gets caught into violent power operations on the borders of an unknown decadent empire. I ensue with the interpretation of Disgrace, which, on the contrary, offers a narrative firmly placed in the real political context of post-apartheid South Africa. There a university professor takes part in the two episodes of violence, both of them sexual and political in nature, neatly mirroring each other in the structure of the novel. Foucauldian reading made in the second part of the paper points to interesting similarities and differences in these stories of power, politics and violence: while the first novel exhibits the functioning of sovereign power and torture, the second novel is more easily located within the interpretive framework of violent popular justice, vividly depicted in Chateaubriand's memoirs of the French Revolution and famously scrutinized in Foucault's discussions with the Maoists and Noam Chomsky in the early 1970s. Both novels, however, clearly show the futility of subject’s escapism. The subject dreams of escape but is thoroughly enmeshed in the nets of power. Often outside of their explicit political awareness, this “mesh of power” constitutes the subjects, reshapes them and brings to their demise, usually in the episodes of political violence. In the final part, I draw some lessons from this reading for the hermeneutics of power, punishment and violence in our present.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Politologija