Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 738609

“What are You doing?”: Comparison of three methodological approaches to studying leisure


Anić, Petra; Tončić, Marko
“What are You doing?”: Comparison of three methodological approaches to studying leisure // Suvremena psihologija, 17 (2014), 2; 109-122 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 738609 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
“What are You doing?”: Comparison of three methodological approaches to studying leisure

Autori
Anić, Petra ; Tončić, Marko

Izvornik
Suvremena psihologija (1331-9264) 17 (2014), 2; 109-122

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
free time ; leisure ; checklist ; favorite activity ; experience sampling

Sažetak
Work or school occupy many hours a day, but still a significant amount of time can be considered as free time. Conspicuous variability in free time activities makes it hard to research, showing the need for combining several methods. The aim of this research was to examine activities in free time with three different methods: free time checklist, favorite activity and experience sampling methodology. 769 students participated in checklist and favorite activity study (mean age 20.57), and 121 students participated in the experience sampling study (mean age 21.62). Different methodological approaches to free time activities scrutiny showed clear differences in their occurrences. Favorite activities were dominantly marked by achievement leisure, with undervalue of activities related to entertainment and social leisure. Experience sampling study showed supremacy of entertainment and social leisure, as well as occurrences of activities related to house and personal maintenance. Estimating leisure activities through checklist indicated high occurrences of reading and low of entertainment leisure activities, which is opposite to the findings obtained by activity sampling. The differences among methodological approaches possibly indicate that the research focus should dictate the choice of the most appropriate methodological approach. Moreover, those differences might point to the fact that self-assessment of leisure activities is biased. At least in part, this could be circumvented by a multimethod approach.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Psihologija



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Rijeka

Profili:

Avatar Url Petra Anić (autor)

Avatar Url Marko Tončić (autor)


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Anić, Petra; Tončić, Marko
“What are You doing?”: Comparison of three methodological approaches to studying leisure // Suvremena psihologija, 17 (2014), 2; 109-122 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Anić, P. & Tončić, M. (2014) “What are You doing?”: Comparison of three methodological approaches to studying leisure. Suvremena psihologija, 17 (2), 109-122.
@article{article, author = {Ani\'{c}, Petra and Ton\v{c}i\'{c}, Marko}, year = {2014}, pages = {109-122}, keywords = {free time, leisure, checklist, favorite activity, experience sampling}, journal = {Suvremena psihologija}, volume = {17}, number = {2}, issn = {1331-9264}, title = {“What are You doing?”: Comparison of three methodological approaches to studying leisure}, keyword = {free time, leisure, checklist, favorite activity, experience sampling} }
@article{article, author = {Ani\'{c}, Petra and Ton\v{c}i\'{c}, Marko}, year = {2014}, pages = {109-122}, keywords = {free time, leisure, checklist, favorite activity, experience sampling}, journal = {Suvremena psihologija}, volume = {17}, number = {2}, issn = {1331-9264}, title = {“What are You doing?”: Comparison of three methodological approaches to studying leisure}, keyword = {free time, leisure, checklist, favorite activity, experience sampling} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus





Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font