Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 721490
In vitro assessment of the accuracy of three electronic apex locators
In vitro assessment of the accuracy of three electronic apex locators // Paediatria Croatica, 58 (2014), 2; 107-113 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 721490 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
In vitro assessment of the accuracy of three
electronic apex locators
Autori
Matijević, Jurica ; Ljubičić, Anita ; Švegar, Domagoj ; Verzak, Željko ; Jukić Krmek, Silvana ; Karlović, Zoran ; Paris, Simeon
Izvornik
Paediatria Croatica (1330-1403) 58
(2014), 2;
107-113
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
dental instruments ; electronics ; medical ; humans ; odontometry ; root canal preparation ; tooth apex
Sažetak
Aim of this in vitro study was to compare accuracy of three electronic apex locators (EALs) (ES-02, ES-03 and ProPex) in root canals of extracted human teeth utilizing two meter readings and different conditions of root canals (RC). RC lengths of 46 single-rooted teeth were visually determined using a K-file # 15. Teeth and labial connector were then embedded in alginate. Two sets of measurements were performed for each device - root canal condition combination (dry root canal, 2.5% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, RC prep, Glyde) according to readings “-0.5” and “0.0”. The differences were evaluated using descriptive and nonparametric statistics. The mean difference between real and measured values at meter reading “0.0” was 0.10 mm with ProPex, 0.31 mm with ES-02 and 0.71 mm with ES- 03. At meter reading “-0.5“ that difference was 0.28 mm with ProPex, 0.41 mm with ES-02 and 0.87 mm with ES-03. In vitro testing showed ProPex to be the most accurate EAL in most of combinations, followed by ES-02, and ES-03 (p<0.05). Most accurate measurements were performed in canal conditions as follows: dry canals, Glyde, Rc- Prep, NaOCl and EDTA solutions (p<0.05). ProPex was the most accurate at meter reading “0.0”. At reading “-0.5” ES-02 and ProPex were equal, whereas ES-03 was the least accurate. All tested EALs should be used with meter reading “0.0” as a reference because it is more accurate than using the meter reading “-0.5” (p<0.001).
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Dentalna medicina, Psihologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
MZOS-065-0650445-0434 - Epidemiološki aspekti endodoncije u Republici Hrvatskoj (Krmek, Silvana, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Rijeka,
Stomatološki fakultet, Zagreb
Profili:
Domagoj Švegar
(autor)
Anita Ljubičić
(autor)
Zoran Karlović
(autor)
Željko Verzak
(autor)
Jurica Matijević
(autor)
Silvana Jukić Krmek
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Scopus
Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka::
- EMBASE (Excerpta Medica)
- Index Copernicus
- Scientific Commons
- EBSCO host
- EJOL