Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 712600

Comparison of Different Strengthening Techniques of Damaged and Weak Reinforced‒Concrete Frames


Grubišić, Marin; Sigmund, Vladimir
Comparison of Different Strengthening Techniques of Damaged and Weak Reinforced‒Concrete Frames // Second European Conferemce on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (2ECEES) / Ansal, Atilla M. (ur.).
Istanbul: EAEE, Maya Basin Yayin ve Matbaacilik Ltd. Şti, 2014. str. 143-150 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 712600 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Comparison of Different Strengthening Techniques of Damaged and Weak Reinforced‒Concrete Frames

Autori
Grubišić, Marin ; Sigmund, Vladimir

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni

Izvornik
Second European Conferemce on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (2ECEES) / Ansal, Atilla M. - Istanbul : EAEE, Maya Basin Yayin ve Matbaacilik Ltd. Şti, 2014, 143-150

ISBN
978-605-62703-6-9

Skup
Second European Conferemce on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (2ECEES)

Mjesto i datum
Istanbul, Turska, 24.08.2014. - 29.08.2014

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
RC frames; Masonry Infill; Seismic Strengthening; Damaged Frames; Weak Frames; Framed‒masonry; Cyclic Testing

Sažetak
As part of a broader research project, attention of this study has been focused on the existing, damaged “strong frame“ RC buildings and “weak frame“ RC buildings, strengthened with clay brick masonry infill walls (“framed‒ wall”). We experimentally investigated different masonry wall application techniques within the frame that upgrade the seismic capacity of these structures. Seven one‒bay, one‒storey RC frames were built in a scale 1:2.5 and 1:2, “strong“ and “weak” frames respectively. They were tested under constant vertical and reversed cyclic lateral loading up to the drift of 1.5%. The experimental results are presented in the form of observed failure mechanism, hysteresis loops and cyclic envelope curves. The tests showed that RC frames strengthened with masonry infill wall had the improved lateral load and deformation capacity as well as energy dissipation. The system behaved as composite “framed‒masonry” structure which damage could be controlled. Cost‒ effectiveness and simplicity of the technique by the implementation of the masonry infill wall seems to be much more favourable than just the repair of the existing RC bare structure.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Građevinarstvo



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
149-1492966-1536 - Seizmički proračun okvirnih konstrukcija s ispunom (Sigmund, Vladimir, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)

Ustanove:
Građevinski i arhitektonski fakultet Osijek

Profili:

Avatar Url Marin Grubišić (autor)

Avatar Url Vladimir Sigmund (autor)


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Grubišić, Marin; Sigmund, Vladimir
Comparison of Different Strengthening Techniques of Damaged and Weak Reinforced‒Concrete Frames // Second European Conferemce on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (2ECEES) / Ansal, Atilla M. (ur.).
Istanbul: EAEE, Maya Basin Yayin ve Matbaacilik Ltd. Şti, 2014. str. 143-150 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
Grubišić, M. & Sigmund, V. (2014) Comparison of Different Strengthening Techniques of Damaged and Weak Reinforced‒Concrete Frames. U: Ansal, A. (ur.)Second European Conferemce on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (2ECEES).
@article{article, author = {Grubi\v{s}i\'{c}, Marin and Sigmund, Vladimir}, editor = {Ansal, A.}, year = {2014}, pages = {143-150}, keywords = {RC frames, Masonry Infill, Seismic Strengthening, Damaged Frames, Weak Frames, Framed‒masonry, Cyclic Testing}, isbn = {978-605-62703-6-9}, title = {Comparison of Different Strengthening Techniques of Damaged and Weak Reinforced‒Concrete Frames}, keyword = {RC frames, Masonry Infill, Seismic Strengthening, Damaged Frames, Weak Frames, Framed‒masonry, Cyclic Testing}, publisher = {EAEE, Maya Basin Yayin ve Matbaacilik Ltd. \c{S}ti}, publisherplace = {Istanbul, Turska} }
@article{article, author = {Grubi\v{s}i\'{c}, Marin and Sigmund, Vladimir}, editor = {Ansal, A.}, year = {2014}, pages = {143-150}, keywords = {RC frames, Masonry Infill, Seismic Strengthening, Damaged Frames, Weak Frames, Framed‒masonry, Cyclic Testing}, isbn = {978-605-62703-6-9}, title = {Comparison of Different Strengthening Techniques of Damaged and Weak Reinforced‒Concrete Frames}, keyword = {RC frames, Masonry Infill, Seismic Strengthening, Damaged Frames, Weak Frames, Framed‒masonry, Cyclic Testing}, publisher = {EAEE, Maya Basin Yayin ve Matbaacilik Ltd. \c{S}ti}, publisherplace = {Istanbul, Turska} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font